Probelm with modeling a triangle

  • Thread starter Thread starter tomallan
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Modeling Triangle
tomallan
Messages
20
Reaction score
0
Hi,
i am trying to model a triangle in a square cell based on its dimension. However, i have some problem with parts of the code, i think it might be the logic behind my programming or over definition with the code itself.

i have attached the code. the problem lies with the second half of the triangle. I have also attached the basis of my analysis. the problem lies between -s/2 to s/2 of the code. Any hints about the wrong logic of my code or over definition will be appreciated. the cell is a square dimension with 2r1x2r1 dimension.

I have attached the MATLAB code and the definition of the cell if you are interested.
 

Attachments

  • triangle_90_deg_surface_step_bottom.m
    triangle_90_deg_surface_step_bottom.m
    7.3 KB · Views: 519
  • 20140901_011337158_iOS.jpg
    20140901_011337158_iOS.jpg
    25.5 KB · Views: 475
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry you are not finding help at the moment. Is there any additional information you can share with us?
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.

Similar threads

Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top