Problem involving a rotating frame. Help

  • #1
ashishsinghal
462
0
This is a conceptual problem which I am facing for many days.

If we convert a scenario in an inertial frame into a rotating frame, we apply a pseudo force i.e. centrifugal force radially outwards on the particle. Right?

Also if a particle is having a circular motion in any frame of reference it must have a centripetal force directed radially inwards in that frame. Right?

Now, if I have a particle A which is at rest with respect to the ground, it has no force on it with respect to the ground. Now if I see this particle in a frame of reference rotating about origin O, I will apply centrifugal force directed along OA. But since in this frame A seems to undergo circular motion it must have an acceleration directed along AO in the rotating frame. But this is not happening. Why?

Please help ASAP. If I am not able to show the situation clearly please tell me.
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
Doc Al
Mentor
45,410
1,841
If we convert a scenario in an inertial frame into a rotating frame, we apply a pseudo force i.e. centrifugal force radially outwards on the particle. Right?
Right.

Also if a particle is having a circular motion in any frame of reference it must have a centripetal force directed radially inwards in that frame. Right?
Right.

Now, if I have a particle A which is at rest with respect to the ground, it has no force on it with respect to the ground. Now if I see this particle in a frame of reference rotating about origin O, I will apply centrifugal force directed along OA. But since in this frame A seems to undergo circular motion it must have an acceleration directed along AO in the rotating frame. But this is not happening. Why?
If it's going in a circle (in that frame) it certainly has a centripetal acceleration.

Realize that the outward centrifugal force is not the only pseudo-force in this scenario. There is also a Coriolis force. Combined, those two give a net force (pseudo-force) in the centripetal direction, as required.

Does that get at your concerns?
 
  • #3
ashishsinghal
462
0
Even I thought the same way. But the coriolis force is not directed radially. It is a tangential force. Also coriolis force depends upon the rate of change of radial distance which here is zero.
 
  • #4
ashishsinghal
462
0
Coriolis force is the tangential force experienced on the particle which is coming closer or going away from the center of circular motion. Just like the winds change directions.
 
  • #5
Doc Al
Mentor
45,410
1,841
Even I thought the same way. But the coriolis force is not directed radially. It is a tangential force. Also coriolis force depends upon the rate of change of radial distance which here is zero.
The Coriolis force will be radially inward.
 
  • #6
ashishsinghal
462
0
Can you please explain why? As according to what I have read it is tangential.
 
  • #7
Aniket1
62
2
There is no centripetal force in this case.
Since in the rotating frame, the object appears to be moving circularly, sum of all forces should be equal to mv^2/r
The forces acting on the object here is the pseudo force due to the rotation of my frame.
thus, Centrifugal force=mv^2/r
Does this solve your problem?
 
  • #8
Doc Al
Mentor
45,410
1,841
Can you please explain why? As according to what I have read it is tangential.
I have no idea why you think that the Coriolis force is tangential. It is always perpendicular to the velocity. It's given by [tex]-2m\vec{\Omega}\times\vec{v}[/tex]
where Ω is the angular velocity vector of the rotating frame. (See Coriolis force or any classical mechanics textbook.)

Thus the Coriolis force is radially inward and equal to 2mω2r and the centrifugal force is radially outward and equal to mω2r. Thus the net force is inward and equal to mω2r, just as you would expect for circular motion.
 
  • #9
Doc Al
Mentor
45,410
1,841
There is no centripetal force in this case.
Since in the rotating frame, the object appears to be moving circularly, sum of all forces should be equal to mv^2/r
There must be a net centripetal force, acting radially inward.
The forces acting on the object here is the pseudo force due to the rotation of my frame.
thus, Centrifugal force=mv^2/r
The centrifugal force acts radially outward. So that's not enough to explain things. See my last post about the Coriolis force.
 
  • #10
vanhees71
Science Advisor
Insights Author
Gold Member
2021 Award
20,701
11,534
There is nothing very complicated involved. For a free particle in the inertial frame with cartesian coordinates [itex]x_j[/itex] you have the Lagrangian
[tex]L=\frac{m}{2} \dot{\vec{x}}^2=\frac{m}{2} \dot{x}_j \dot{x}_j.[/tex]
Here and in the following Einstein summation is implied.

In terms of the coordinates [itex]y_j[/itex] fixed in the rotating frame (let's assume the rotation is around the three-axis) you have
[tex]\begin{pmatrix}
x_1 \\ x_2 \\ x_3 \end{pmatrix}=\begin{pmatrix}
\cos (\omega t) & -\sin (\omega t) & 0\\
\sin (\omega t) & \cos (\omega t) & 0 \\
0 & 0 & 1
\end{pmatrix} \begin{pmatrix} y_1 \\ y_2 \\y_3 \end{pmatrix} \qquad (*). [/tex]

Now take the time derivative of this and pluck it into the above Lagrangian. You'll get after some algebra
[tex]L=\frac{m}{2} \left [\dot{y}_j \dot{y}_j+2 \omega (y_1 \dot{y}_2-y_2 \dot{y}_1)+\omega^2 (y_1^2+y_2^2) \right ].[/tex]

With [itex]\vec{\omega}=\omega (0,0,1)^t[/itex] this reads
[tex]L=\frac{m}{2} \left [\dot{\vec{y}}^2+2 \vec{\omega} \cdot (\vec{y} \times \dot{\vec{y}}) + (\vec{\omega} \times \vec{y})^2 \right].[/tex]

With the Euler-Lagrange equations you'll get the correct equations of motion, which can be reinterpreted as the motion of a particle under the influence of the Coriolis and the centrifugal force:
[tex]m \ddot{\vec{y}}=-m \left [2 \vec{\omega} \times \dot{\vec{y}}-\vec{\omega} \times (\vec{\omega} \times \vec{y}) \right ].[/tex]

Of course you could also simply derive Eq. (*) two times wrt. to time, but that's more cumbersome :-).
 
  • #11
ashishsinghal
462
0
There is nothing very complicated involved.

Sir, thanks for all the effort but after the work you just showed me I would seriously ask you to consider your definition of complicated. But thanks for your effort.
 
  • #12
ashishsinghal
462
0
I have no idea why you think that the Coriolis force is tangential. It is always perpendicular to the velocity. It's given by [tex]-2m\vec{\Omega}\times\vec{v}[/tex]
where Ω is the angular velocity vector of the rotating frame. (See Coriolis force or any classical mechanics textbook.)

Thus the Coriolis force is radially inward and equal to 2mω2r and the centrifugal force is radially outward and equal to mω2r. Thus the net force is inward and equal to mω2r, just as you would expect for circular motion.

I went to the wikipedia link you posted. Yup,I admit I was mistaken. Coriolis force can be in any direction in the plane of circular motion. Thanks a lot.
 
  • #13
ashishsinghal
462
0
Thanks everyone. Special thanks to Doc Al. This thread is closed.
 

Suggested for: Problem involving a rotating frame. Help

  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
50
Views
4K
  • Last Post
Replies
0
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Top