Problem of formula Hall constant

  • Thread starter Thread starter thanhmssl10
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Constant Formula
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the Hall constant formula, initially presented as k=1/n.e, with a more accurate version proposed as k=(2/3)(1/n.e). The user seeks assistance in proving the more accurate formula despite not needing it for an exam. They express curiosity about the topic and invite further information or rewording suggestions to generate responses. The thread highlights the importance of understanding the derivation of the Hall constant in physics.
thanhmssl10
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hi, this is my first thread in PF, please help me

My document prove the formula of Hall constant very simply and it's k=1/n.e
But my document also say that it's Approximate, and formula more accurate is k= (2/3).(1/n.e)

I want to know how to prove this formula
I am very curious though i may not need it for exam.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Thanks for the post! Sorry you aren't generating responses at the moment. Do you have any further information, come to any new conclusions or is it possible to reword the post?
 
Hello! Let's say I have a cavity resonant at 10 GHz with a Q factor of 1000. Given the Lorentzian shape of the cavity, I can also drive the cavity at, say 100 MHz. Of course the response will be very very weak, but non-zero given that the Loretzian shape never really reaches zero. I am trying to understand how are the magnetic and electric field distributions of the field at 100 MHz relative to the ones at 10 GHz? In particular, if inside the cavity I have some structure, such as 2 plates...
Back
Top