Problem regardin an elastic wire.

  • Thread starter Thread starter DorelXD
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Elastic Wire
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves an elastic wire with specific characteristics, including initial length, cross-sectional area, and Young's modulus. A body is suspended from the middle of the wire, causing an elongation, and the task is to find the potential energy of deformation stored in the wire at equilibrium.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the implications of hanging a weight from the middle of the wire and how it affects the wire's elongation. There are questions about the definitions of elongation and strain, as well as the geometry involved in the problem.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring various interpretations of elongation and strain. Some have offered guidance on drawing free body diagrams and understanding the balance of forces, while others are clarifying definitions and relationships between the lengths of the wire before and after the weight is applied.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the definitions of elongation and whether it refers to the whole wire or just one half. Participants are also addressing potential algebraic mistakes and the implications of their assumptions in the problem setup.

DorelXD
Messages
126
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



An elastic wire has the folowing charcteristics:initial length l_0=60cm,section S=6mm^2,Young's Modulus E=\frac{12MN}{m^-2}.Initially the wire has both ends fixed. Its initial position is horizontal, untensioned. At the middle of the wire it's hanged a body that produces an elongation equal to 8 cm. Find the potential energy of deformation stored in the wire, when the body reaches its equilibrium position.

Homework Equations


\frac{F}{S}=E\frac{Δl}{l_0}
F_e=kx
E_e=\frac{k*Δl^2}{2}

The Attempt at a Solution



Well what bugs me is that I don't know what to do with the elongation in the problem. It confuses me that we pull from the middle of the wire, and not from one of its ends. Can somebody help me to understand this problem, please? Also I don't know what the spring constant is.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
When you hang something in the middle of the wire, you are going to pull the wire downward from its original position. Think what happens to a clothesline (if you know what that is). It would be helpful to draw a free body diagram of the wire suspending the weight. The vertical components of the tension in the wire must balance the weight suspended.
 
First of all, thank you for your answer!
When you hang something in the middle of the wire, you are going to pull the wire downward from its original position. Think what happens to a clothesline (if you know what that is).

Yes, I know what a clothesline is. I understand that the wire it's pulled downward, this is easy.

It would be helpful to draw a free body diagram of the wire suspending the weight.
This is easy too. I had drawn it before I posted it, but it was on a piece of paper. Here is a picture of the free body-diagram (I know it's not complete, I should have decomposed the tensions(is this term correct? I'm not a native speaker) in the vertical and horizontal components. I drew it in paint because I don't know any better way to do it. If you know, please tell me.

sketch_zpsefa0c654.png


The vertical components of the tension in the wire must balance the weight suspended.

I get it. This is pretty straight forward from the inital supposition of the problem that the body remains in equilibrium.

So we now have:

mg=2Tcos\Theta
 
So do you understand what to do with the elongation now?
 
From the geometry that you have drawn, how much longer are each of the two halves of the wire now than they were before you hung the weight?
 
haruspex said:
So do you understand what to do with the elongation now?
Well, not yet.
From the geometry that you have drawn, how much longer are each of the two halves of the wire now than they were before you hung the weight?
Well, the initial length of one half is: l_i=\frac{l_0}{2}.

The final length is: l_f=\frac{li}{sin\Theta}=\frac{l_0}{2sin\Theta}, isn't it?

So \Delta l=l_f-l_i=\frac{l_0}{2sin\Theta}-\frac{l_0}{2}=\frac{l_0(1-sin\Theta)}{2sin\Theta},right?

Thank you both for your answers!
 
Last edited:
DorelXD said:
So \Delta l=l_f-l_i=\frac{l_0}{2}-\frac{l_0}{2sin\Theta}=\frac{l_0(sin\Theta-1)}{2sin\Theta},right?

Should that not be ## \Delta l = 2(l_f - l_i) ##? And, ##l_f - l_i = \frac{l_0}{2sin\Theta} - \frac{l_0}{2}##.
 
voko said:
Should that not be ## \Delta l = 2(l_f - l_i) ##? And, ##l_f - l_i = \frac{l_0}{2sin\Theta} - \frac{l_0}{2}##.

Thank you for your time! But why is it like this? Have I made some algebra mistake or have I missed something?
 
DorelXD said:
Thank you for your time! But why is it like this? Have I made some algebra mistake or have I missed something?

All of that follows from your definitions in #6.
 
  • #10
voko said:
All of that follows from your definitions in #6.

Excuse me, but I don't undersatnd. What definition? And what is #6?
 
  • #11
DorelXD said:
Excuse me, but I don't undersatnd. What definition? And what is #6?

#6 is message number 6 in this thread:

DorelXD said:
Well, not yet.

Well, the initial length of one half is: l_i=\frac{l_0}{2}.

The final length is: l_f=\frac{li}{sin\Theta}=\frac{l_0}{2sin\Theta}, isn't it?

So \Delta l=l_f-l_i=\frac{l_0}{2}-\frac{l_0}{2sin\Theta}=\frac{l_0(sin\Theta-1)}{2sin\Theta},right?

Thank you both for your answers!

In it, you defined that ##l_i## and ##l_f## are the initial and the final lengths of one half of the wire.
 
  • #12
voko said:
#6 is message number 6 in this thread:
In it, you defined that ##l_i## and ##l_f## are the initial and the final lengths of one half of the wire.

Yes, it's true. But \Delta l is the elongation of one half, not the elongation of the whole wire. The elongation of the whole wire would be 2\Delta l, isn't it? This confusion is beacuse of me, I get it. When I first created this theard and I posted the main equations I used \Delta l as the elongation of the whole wire. So, given the fact that \Delta l is the elongation of only one half (besides in #1 where \Delta l is the elongation of the whole wire) is my judgement correct?
 
  • #13
DorelXD said:
Yes, it's true. But \Delta l is the elongation of one half, not the elongation of the whole wire. The elongation of the whole wire would be 2\Delta l, isn't it? This confusion is beacuse of me, I get it. When I first created this theard and I posted the main equations I used \Delta l as the elongation of the whole wire. So, given the fact that \Delta l is the elongation of only one half (besides in #1 where \Delta l is the elongation of the whole wire) is my judgement correct?

Correct, but mind the order of ##l_i## and ##l_f## in the difference.
 
  • #14
So now that you know the change in length of half the wire and the original length of half the wire, what is the strain?
 
  • #15
voko said:
Correct, but mind the order of ##l_i## and ##l_f## in the difference.
Yes, I've corrected. I was very uncareful. Thank you for pointing that out!

So now that you know the change in length of half the wire and the original length of half the wire, what is the strain?

Well it'll be:

2\Delta l=2(l_f-l_i)=2(\frac{l_0}{2sin\Theta}-\frac{l_0}{2})=\frac{l_0(1-sin\Theta)}{sin\Theta},right?
 
  • #16
DorelXD said:
Yes, I've corrected. I was very uncareful. Thank you for pointing that out!



Well it'll be:

2\Delta l=2(l_f-l_i)=2(\frac{l_0}{2sin\Theta}-\frac{l_0}{2})=\frac{l_0(1-sin\Theta)}{sin\Theta},right?
Yes.
 
  • #17
I've managed to solve the problem, much more simpler than the initial approach. If everyone is intersted please let me know, and I'll post it here. Thank you again for your answers!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
14
Views
5K