Studying Problem solving of complex physics problem

AI Thread Summary
When tackling complex physics problems, a structured approach is essential. Writing down the problem is a foundational step, as emphasized by Richard Feynman, which helps clarify thoughts. Key strategies include visualizing the problem through drawings or graphs and breaking it down into manageable parts, although care must be taken to avoid mistakes in this division. The discussion highlights the importance of asking insightful questions to explore the problem from various angles, ensuring a comprehensive understanding. The effectiveness of top-down versus bottom-up approaches is debated, with a preference for top-down methods noted. Ultimately, creativity in problem-solving is seen as a skill that can be developed through practice and understanding how to organize and combine information effectively.
physics user1
What kind of steps do you use when you need to solve a complex physics problem?
What kind of questiono do you ask yourself?

Richard Feynman said that you have to write down the problem and then think hard, but what thoughts and questions can help yourself find a creative solution?
Is creativity a random and lucky thing?

Which approach is the most useful, top down or bottom up? I think top down what about you?

In my opinion is important to make a drawing or a graph and imaginate the situation, eventually if the problem is too complex dividing it in parts, but sometimes is easy to make mistakes or not seeing the solution or in whitch way you need to divide the problem, or at least finding the best solution, the creative one that one that is elegant and clever, what questions and what steps do you need to follow in the solving process in order to help yourself to find ideas or to fully understand the problem, I mean seeing the problem by all the angulations, understanding the parts of the problem and not forgetting anything?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hey Cozma Alex.

I guess it depends on how you "divide" things up - there are many ways to do so.

One of the things with problem solving is that there are many ways to organize and combine information in order to get some resolution to the problem itself.

The thing is that often new ways of doing this are needed to solve new kinds of problems. If you understand how things can be broken up then that can be quite useful.
 
  • Like
Likes physics user1
I’ve been looking through the curricula of several European theoretical/mathematical physics MSc programs (ETH, Oxford, Cambridge, LMU, ENS Paris, etc), and I’m struck by how little emphasis they place on advanced fundamental courses. Nearly everything seems to be research-adjacent: string theory, quantum field theory, quantum optics, cosmology, soft matter physics, black hole radiation, etc. What I don’t see are the kinds of “second-pass fundamentals” I was hoping for, things like...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...
Back
Top