Problem Solving Textbook Recomendations

AI Thread Summary
A proposed class on problem solving aims to transition students from writing equations to articulating mathematical ideas in prose. Recommendations for textbooks include "Mathematical Logic" by Joseph Shoenfield and "Logic" by Wilfrid Hodges, which are praised for their clarity and foundational approach to logic and proof writing. Understanding basic logic and set theory is emphasized as beneficial for enhancing problem-solving skills. The discussion highlights the importance of formalizing mathematical language and concepts to improve student comprehension. Overall, the focus is on equipping students with the tools to effectively communicate their mathematical reasoning.
snoble
Messages
127
Reaction score
0
I might be teaching a class next year simply called "problem solving." The idea of the class is to survey a several different general topics with a goal of teaching students how to mathematically and formally write up their ideas. Basically get students out of the Calc I habit of writing strings of equations and moving them towards a more prose discussion of their work.

Hopefully this will be the answer to students who complain "no one has ever told us what is a proof."

In the past this class has been taught without a textbook but I would be curious if anyone has any recommendations for a textbook on such a general topic.

Text book questions are not that important as I should have a wealth of questions to choose from. Does anybody remember reading a particular text when suddenly it clicked as to how this whole math language thing worked? I'm still waiting for it to click in my head how this whole english language thing works.

Steven
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I wouldve never guessed english was your second language, but that epiphany happened to me outside of a textbook, but rather just at a general college experience.

However, I did use Stewart's 5th Edition MV calc with transcendentals for my calc 1-3 series.
 
mathwonk just taught a similar class (here's the thread). You may want to PM him if he doesn't see this.
Everything just clicked for me recently when I understood what it meant for a propositional calculus to be sound and complete (in the sense that a formula F being a theorem implies F is a tautology and F being a tautology imples F is a theorem- apparently soundness and completeness have different meanings in different contexts). matt grime has said that a superficial skate through logic does more harm than good, but if you want to take the time, really understanding some basic logic and set theory would certainly help with problem solving and proof writing.
I've never taught a class before, but for what it's worth, I would want to have learned logic as follows. Read section 1.1 of "Mathematical Logic" by Joseph Shoenfield. Cover "Logic" by Wilfrid Hodges up to the introduction of syntactic sequents. Learn to use the natural deduction system presented here. Finish Hodges. Digest chapter 7 of "Set theory, logic and their limitations" by Moshé Machover. Add in some basic set theory, and I'd feel prepared for anything :)
You can read section 1.1 of Shoenfield online here. He sets the stage gently, and it really helps to be given those pieces straight away. "Logic" by Wilfrid Hodges is the best (and smallest) logic book I've ever read. He starts with arguments and validity, assuming no prior knowledge of logic, and covers all of the basics, with one exception: He doesn't introduce a proof procedure. But you can find several natural deduction systems online, like the one listed above, and they're easy to pick up. Because it's so well-written, the book is very tiny; I think I read it in about a week. A new edition is coming out in Decemeber and I can only find it used in the US- less than $20. The most recent edition is still available new in the UK - 7 pounds @Amazon- if you're not in the UK, it's a deal even with shipping.
Chapter 7 of "Set theory, logic and their limitations" by Moshé Machover formalizes Hodges. He constructs the language from scratch- and this is what I find makes such an enormous difference. The chapter concludes with a completeness proof. He uses the Definiton-Theorem-Remark format and doesn't waste a word, so it would be easy to write up your own notes (so your students wouldn't need the book). From Amazon- $33 new, $20 used. Worth its weight in gold. :)
You can incorporate problems from other branches of math along the way. And propositional logic is simple enough that you can start with almost nothing and build a whole system in a rather short time- and having a whole system in hand is when it clicked in a huge way for me. Plus, it's a great launchpad. Okay, I'm shutting up. Good luck with the class. :smile:
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top