Problem stating: if A = x - 1/x, find A - 1/A

  • Thread starter Thread starter trip7
  • Start date Start date
AI Thread Summary
To solve the problem A = x - 1/x and find A - 1/A, start by expressing A as a single fraction: A = (x^2 - 1)/x. Then, calculate 1/A as x/(x^2 - 1). The next step is to find A - 1/A by subtracting these two fractions, which involves finding a common denominator. Simplifying the resulting expression will lead to the final answer. The discussion highlights the importance of fraction simplification and finding a common denominator in algebraic problems.
trip7
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I have a math problem stating:
if A = x - 1/x, find A - 1/A

I have no clue as to how to solve this. Any insight would be greatly appreciated.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
You have that:

A = x - 1/x
1/A = 1/(x - 1/x)

Then A - 1/A = what?
 
Muzza:
Im sure this is easy but I am completely missing the logic. I haven't done this kind of math in a while and hoping you could explain the logic.
 
Just simplify the fractions...

A = x - \frac {1}{x} = \frac{x^2 - 1}{x}

So, ~ 1/A = \frac {x} {x^2 -1}

So, ~A - 1/A = \frac{x^2 - 1}{x} - \frac {x} {x^2 -1}

Take the lcm and simplify.
 
Thanks Gokul43201:

Ok, now I got it.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top