Problem understanding number of degrees of freedom

AI Thread Summary
In a classical mechanics context, the degrees of freedom (DoF) for a system of point masses is calculated using the formula N=3M-j, where M is the number of masses and j is the number of constraints. For a rigid body, there are typically 6 DoF, comprising 3 translational and 3 rotational. In a specific example involving a 4-point mass system with 5 constraints, the calculated DoF is 7, indicating that the constraints do not fully restrict the system's movement. The discussion clarifies that while the constraints help determine positions, they do not eliminate all rotational and translational freedom. To fully constrain the system, additional constraints would be necessary.
UniPhysics90
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi,

I do a classical mechanics course, and part of it relates to degrees of freedom.

For a system M of point masses with j constraints, there is N=3M-j DoF

For a rigid body, I know there is 6 DoF (3 translational, 3 rotational).

However, I've tried using drawing the constraints on a 4 point mass system to make it a rigid system. I've done this with 5 constraints (3 rigid rods in blue and 2 fixed angles in green). With 5 constraints the formula gives N=(3x4)-5=7 DoF.

Could someone explain this please?

[PLAIN]http://img152.imageshack.us/img152/7426/degreesoffreedom.png

It'd be greatly appreciated. Thanks

EDIT: I think I understand this now, because it's a rigid body, you can work out all other positions in the system itself from the 5 given constraints. All that you can't work out, is the rotational and translational DoF of the system as a whole.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
The figure you have drawn does have 7 degrees of freedom. The "constraints" (rods) that you've placed between the points do not fully constrain the object in 3 dimensions---you can twist the vertical and horizontal bars around the diagonal bar (if that makes sense).

In other words, there are 3x translation, 3x rotation, and also an undefined angle between one of the green angles and the plane of the other. To fully constrain the arrangement of your figure, you would have to add another fixed angle, or fixed distance.
 
Thread 'Question about pressure of a liquid'
I am looking at pressure in liquids and I am testing my idea. The vertical tube is 100m, the contraption is filled with water. The vertical tube is very thin(maybe 1mm^2 cross section). The area of the base is ~100m^2. Will he top half be launched in the air if suddenly it cracked?- assuming its light enough. I want to test my idea that if I had a thin long ruber tube that I lifted up, then the pressure at "red lines" will be high and that the $force = pressure * area$ would be massive...
I feel it should be solvable we just need to find a perfect pattern, and there will be a general pattern since the forces acting are based on a single function, so..... you can't actually say it is unsolvable right? Cause imaging 3 bodies actually existed somwhere in this universe then nature isn't gonna wait till we predict it! And yea I have checked in many places that tiny changes cause large changes so it becomes chaos........ but still I just can't accept that it is impossible to solve...
Back
Top