Problem Understanding theorm of Cross Product

  • #1
784
11

Homework Statement


My textbook says:
The length of the cross product a x b is equal to the area of the parallelogram determined by a and b.

How can a length equal and area? They have different units?
 

Answers and Replies

  • #2
34,671
6,384

Homework Statement


My textbook says:
The length of the cross product a x b is equal to the area of the parallelogram determined by a and b.

How can a length equal and area? They have different units?
They are numerically equal. That doesn't say anything about units, just that the numbers are the same.
 
  • #3
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,260
619

Homework Statement


My textbook says:
The length of the cross product a x b is equal to the area of the parallelogram determined by a and b.

How can a length equal and area? They have different units?
If a and b have dimension length, then axb properly has dimension (length)^2. So does the area of a parallelogram.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
34,671
6,384
If a and b have dimension length, then axb properly has dimension (length)^2.
You're going to have to convince me, Dick. a X b is a vector, and its magnitude is a length. I don't see how you can get (length)2 out of a vector.
So does the area of a parallelogram.
 
  • #5
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,260
619
You're going to have to convince me, Dick. a X b is a vector, and its magnitude is a length. I don't see how you can get (length)2 out of a vector.
I'll try. The components of axb are products of components of a and b. If the components of a and b have dimension length, that means the components of axb have dimension (length)^2. Not all vectors have dimension length. An example from physics is that angular momentum is defined by l=rxp. r has dimensions of length (m), p has the dimensions of momentum (kg*m/s). l has dimensions of angular momentum (kg*m^2/s).
 
  • #6
Office_Shredder
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Gold Member
4,166
322
Dick, my mind is blown right now.
 
  • #7
Dick
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
26,260
619
Dick, my mind is blown right now.
I'm kind of surprised this is of mind-blowing proportions. It's just consistently tracking units. In math, you largely treat vectors as dimensionless, so the issue never comes up. If your vectors are dimensionful and you want a length vector perpendicular to a and b, you should use axb/(length units). Which you usually do anyway, just by ignoring the (length)^2 aspect of axb. It should really be satisfying that |axb| correctly has the dimensions of a parallelogram area. Don't get me talking about differential forms and duality. It's why there is a 'cross product' only in three dimensions. The dimension funnyness reflects that.
 
Last edited:
  • #8
D H
Staff Emeritus
Science Advisor
Insights Author
15,393
685
You're going to have to convince me, Dick. a X b is a vector, and its magnitude is a length. I don't see how you can get (length)2 out of a vector.
I never use "length" as a synonym for the magnitude of a physical vector. What is the length of a velocity vector? That doesn't quite make sense. Velocity has dimensionality of length per time, not length. The magnitude of that velocity vector? That makes sense, and it even has a name: Speed.
 

Related Threads on Problem Understanding theorm of Cross Product

  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
6K
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
998
  • Last Post
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
4
Views
17K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Last Post
Replies
5
Views
12K
  • Last Post
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Last Post
Replies
14
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
836
Top