Problem with changing basis in Hilbert space

Chain
Messages
35
Reaction score
3
The expansion theorem in quantum mechanics states that a general state of a system can be represented by a unique linear combination of the eigenstates of any Hermitian operator.

If that's the case then that would imply we would be able to represent the spin state of a particle in terms of it's energy eigenstates for example however surely it's impossible to do this for a particle in an infinite square well for instance, since the energy eigenstates are independent of spin.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't see how that implication comes from the statement... You can represent the spin with a unique linear combination of the spin eigenstates, you can represent the energy state as a linear combination of energy eigenstates. Is this not right?
 
There are two difficulties.

... a general state of a system can be represented by a unique linear combination of the eigenstates of any Hermitian operator.

This is not necessarily always true. In quantum theory, it can be proven only for certain operators. I think perhaps the Hamiltonian of a harmonic oscillator is a good example in this respect. But I have read somewhere that it is difficult to prove generally that eigenfunctions of every Hermitian operator will form a basis. Often this has to be just assumed.

we would be able to represent the spin state of a particle in terms of it's energy eigenstates for example

No, of course this is not so. The above theorem or assumption applies to single Hilbert space. Spin state and coordinate wave functions belong to different Hilbert spaces.
 
Jano L. said:
[...] But I have read somewhere that it is difficult to prove generally that eigenfunctions of every Hermitian operator will form a basis.[...]

Indeed, the nuclear spectral theorem is hard to prove, but nonetheless correct.

Jano L said:
[...] Often this has to be just assumed.[...].

It's always assumed, if you minimize the mathematical rigurosity of your treatment.

Jano L said:
[...] The above theorem or assumption applies to single Hilbert space. Spin state and coordinate wave functions belong to different Hilbert spaces.

The product of the two (i.e. the wavefunction of the system) belongs to the direct product (rigged) Hilbert space.
 
Ah okay fair enough guys, I thought it literally meant a wavefunction could be expanded as the eigenstates of any Hermitian operator, so basically the theorem is true only if the observables belong to the same Hilbert space?

Thanks for the replies :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top