Is G's Value Changing? Investigate the Controversy!

  • Thread starter TheAntiRelative
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Value
In summary: GIn summary, the value of G is in dispute and new measurements suggest it could be much larger than originally thought. Several efforts are being made to make a more reliable measurement of G.
  • #1
TheAntiRelative
133
0
Problem with G??

This tickled my fancy... anyone else heard anything like this before??

http://www.npl.washington.edu/eotwash/gconst.html

Recently the value of G has been called into question by new measurements from respected research teams in Germany, New Zealand, and Russia. The new values disagree wildly. For example, a team from the German Institute of Standards led by W. Michaelis obtained a value for G that is 0.6% larger than the accepted value; a group from the University of Wuppertal in Germany led by Hinrich Meyer found a value that is 0.06% lower, and Mark Fitzgerald and collaborators at Measurement Standards Laboratory of New Zealand measured a value that is 0.1% lower. The Russian group found a curious space and time variation of G of up to 0.7% The collection of these new results suggests that the uncertainty in G could be much larger than originally thought. This controversy has spurred several efforts to make a more reliable measurement of G.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Is this just really new or just too far out there to comment on?
 
  • #3
G...

Just like any empirical constant (like 'little' g), G is the attempt of humans to fit a value to a quantity that has no real significance. G is just the empirical constant Newton needed to describe the effects of gravity. On a macro scale, knowing a 'constant' to within 1% is pretty damn good. Since Newton's equation for gravity is a macro scale equation, that's fine for me.

For example, when calculating the gravitational attraction between Sol and Earth, the masses of the bodies is less well known than 1%, so the error added in by G is marginal at best.
 
  • #4
Most of the constants of nature are known to much better precision than G, it has been notoriously difficult to measure accurately. It's not really a scandal, just a well-known difficulty. It doesn't affect the truth or falsity of any theories.
 
  • #5
Wouldn't it effect many of our accepted astronomical measurements though? I realize the formulas remain unchanged but the output seems like it might be significantly different.
 
  • #6
Cosmological constraints on variation of G over time are much tighter than those established based on solar system experiments. Here is an example based on WMAP data:
"WMAP constraints on scalar-tensor cosmology and the variation of the gravitational constant"
http://arxiv.org/abs/astro-ph/0311274
 

1. Is G's value actually changing?

The controversy surrounding G's value changing stems from a 2010 study by the International Bureau of Weights and Measures (BIPM) that suggested a small fluctuation in G's value. However, this has not been confirmed by subsequent experiments and is still a topic of debate among scientists. Some argue that the results of the 2010 study may have been affected by external factors and do not necessarily reflect a change in G's value.

2. What is G and why is it important?

G, or the gravitational constant, is a fundamental physical constant that determines the strength of the gravitational force between two objects. It is crucial in understanding and predicting the behavior of objects in the universe, from the motion of planets and stars to the structure of galaxies. It is also used in various fields such as astrophysics, engineering, and geology.

3. How is G's value determined?

G's value is determined through experiments using highly sensitive equipment, such as a torsion balance. This involves measuring the gravitational force between two objects with known masses and distances. The results of these experiments are then used to calculate G's value. However, due to the difficulty of these experiments, there is still some uncertainty in the exact value of G.

4. Has G's value changed in the past?

There is no conclusive evidence that G's value has changed in the past. The current controversy surrounding G's value stems from the 2010 study, but there is no historical data or evidence to suggest that G's value has significantly fluctuated over time. However, further research and experiments are needed to fully understand the behavior of G and its potential changes.

5. How does a potential change in G's value impact our understanding of the universe?

If G's value were to change, it could have significant implications for our understanding of the universe. It could affect our understanding of the laws of gravity and how they govern the behavior of objects in the universe. It could also potentially change our calculations and predictions for various phenomena, such as the motion of celestial bodies and the structure of the universe. However, until there is solid evidence of a change in G's value, its impact on our understanding remains a topic of speculation.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
3
Replies
83
Views
12K
  • Quantum Interpretations and Foundations
Replies
25
Views
1K
  • Set Theory, Logic, Probability, Statistics
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top