Problem with integrating heaviside function.

Click For Summary
The discussion centers around integrating a function involving the Heaviside function, specifically the integral from 0 to 8 of (2H[x-0]+2H[x-4])*(x/8)dx. Participants clarify that the integral of the Heaviside function, H(x), is piecewise defined, being 0 for x < 0 and x for x ≥ 0. They suggest using integration by parts and properties of the Dirac delta function to evaluate the integral. The conversation emphasizes the importance of understanding the Heaviside function's behavior in different intervals and provides guidance on how to approach the integration process. Overall, the thread offers valuable insights into integrating functions involving the Heaviside function.
perpich08
Messages
2
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I need to find the integral of the following equation..

integral from 0 to 8 of {(2H[x-0]+2H[x-4])*(x/8)}dx

The Attempt at a Solution


Im am not sure what the integral of the heaviside function is?
is it 1 or 0?

Any help would be appreciated!
Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Write your function as a piecewise defined function and you will see how to integrate it.

f(x) = ? if 0 < x < 4
f(x) = ? if 4 < x < 8

Remember H(x) = 0 if x < 0 and H(x) = 1 if x > 0.

Also drawing the graph might help.
 
Last edited:
The integral of the Heaviside function, H(x), is just xH(x)+ C.
 
perpich08 said:
Im am not sure what the integral of the heaviside function is?

Use integration by parts and the fact that h&#039;(x - x_{0}) = \delta(x - x_{0}):

<br /> \int_{a}^{b}{h(x - x_{0}) \, dx} = \left. x \, h(x - x_{0}) \right|^{b}_{a} - \int_{a}^{b}{x \, \delta(x - x_{0}) \, dx}<br />

Next, the integral with the Dirac delta-function can be evaluated using its property:

<br /> \int_{a}^{b}{x \, \delta(x - x_{0}) \, dx} = x_{0} \, h(x_{0} - a) \, h(b - x_{0})<br />

where the product of the two Heaviside functions ensures that x_{0} is inside the segment x_{0} \in \left[a, b \right]. The integrated-out part is:

<br /> b \, h(b - x_{0}) - a \, h(a - x_{0})<br />

Combining everything together gives:

<br /> \int_{a}^{b}{h(x - x_{0}) \, dx} = b \, h(b - x_{0}) - a \, h(a - x_{0}) - x_{0} \, h(x_{0} - a) \, h(b - x_{0})<br />
 
As a check, let us differentiate it w.r.t. b:

<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial b} \left( b \, h(b - x_{0}) \right) = 1 \cdot h(b - x_{0}) + b \cdot \delta(b - x_{0}) = h(b - x_{0}) + x_{0} \, \delta(b - x_{0})<br />

<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial b} \left( -a \, h(a - x_{0}) \right) = 0<br />

<br /> \frac{\partial}{\partial b} \left( -x_{0} \, h(b - x_{0}) h(x_{0} - a) \right) = -x_{0} \, \delta(b - x_{0}) \, h(x_{0} - a) = -x_{0} \, \delta(b - x_{0}) \, h(b - a) = -x_{0} \delta(b - x_{0})<br />

where again we used the derivative of the Heaviside step function and a consequence of the properties of the Dirac delta-function (x \, \delta(x - x_{0}) = x_{0} \, \delta(x - x_{0})) as well as the assumption that b &gt; a. Combining everything together and substituting b \rightarrow x. we see that we get the integrand. Also, if b = a, the first two terms cancel and the last cancels because h(a - x_{0}) h(x_{0} - a) is always zero. So, according to the fundamental theorem of calculus, we should get the correct result.
 
Last edited:
Of course, you can always write:

<br /> \int_{0}^{8}{\left( 2 h(x) + 2 h(x - 4) \right) \frac{x}{8} \, dx} = \frac{1}{4} \, \left[\int_{0}^{8}{x \, h(x) \, dx} + \int_{0}^{8}{x \, h(x - 4) \, dx}\right]<br />

<br /> \frac{1}{4} \, \left[ \int_{0}^{8}{x \, dx} + \int_{4}^{8}{x \, dx}\right]<br />

and do the remaining elementary integrals :)
 
Thanks guys! I think I can figure it out now
 
I would consider using integration by parts for integrating the Heaviside function "overkill".

If a<0, then H(x)= 0 for all x\le 0 so \int_{-\infty}^a H(x)dx= 0. For a\ge 0, \int_{-\infty}^a H(x)dx= \int_0^a H(x)dx= \int_0^a dx= a.

For the "indefinite integral" \int H(x)dx is 0+ C for x< 0, x+ C for x\ge 0.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
5K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
8K
Replies
4
Views
4K