Problem with the harmonic oscillator equation for small oscillations

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
3 replies · 2K views
PhillipLammsoose
Messages
2
Reaction score
1
TL;DR
I have an extra term in my harmonic oscillator equatiion, does it destroy the solution for small frequencies?
Hey, I solved a problem about a double pendulum and got 2 euler-lagrange equations:

1) x''+y''+g/r*x=0
2) x''+y'' +g/r*y=0 (where x is actually a tetha and y=phi)

the '' stand for the 2nd derivation after t, so you can see the basic harmonic oscillator equation with a term x'' or y'' that bother me. How do these terms effect the endresult for the frequency of small oscillations? I know w^2 (omega) would be w^2=g/r for a classic form of the equation, but what about the x'' or y''?

thanks for helping, I hope this was readable.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm a bit puzzled by your equations. Maybe you give some details about how you parametrized the problem?

In any case, for such a problem of linear coupled ODE's with constant coefficients the usual ansatz is
$$x=A \exp(\mathrm{i} \omega t), \quad y=B \exp(\mathrm{i} \omega t).$$
This leads to a eigenvalue problem, which determines ##\omega## (the frequencies of the fundamental modes of the system) and, for each ##\omega##, ##A## and ##B## (the corresponding eigenvectors).
 
I solved this by seeing that x has to equal y in the 2 equations, so I got a new equation with $$2\ddot{x}+\frac{g}{r}x=0$$ which was the generic harmonic equation I was looking for.
 
Well, this is one of the two normal modes. You need to find another one. For me it's still not clear that these are the right equations for the double pendulum...