Problem with the sum of a Fourier series

In summary, the Fourier sum in the region ##x=2+\epsilon\ ## bounces between ##\log 3 ## and ##\log 2 ##.f
  • #1
310
54
Homework Statement
Look at the image
Relevant Equations
Fourier serie
Good day
1612882634390.png


I really don't understand how they got this result? for me the sum of the Fourier serie of of f is equal to f(2)=log(3)
any help would be highly appreciated!
thanks in advance!
 
  • #2
Hi,
Sounds reasonable. However:
what is the sum at ##\ x=2+\epsilon\ ## with ##\ \ 0<\epsilon <<< 1\ ## ?
 
  • #3
thanks for your prompt answer,
as I saw it, I can't plug it the function f(x), so I really have no clue ...:oldconfused:
 
  • #4
The function is periodic, so ##f(2+\epsilon) = f(-{1\over2}+\epsilon)##.
What is ## f(-{1\over2})## ?
 
  • #5
f(-1/2)=f(2)=log(3) as they are periodic, right?
 
  • #6
And it jumps down to what when you go a little further ?
 
  • #7
so maybe I got you
In this region the value of f(-1/2)=0 so the we are in discountinous stepwise function, in which tthe value of f(2+e)
bounces between 2 and 0?
 
  • #8
i mean jump between log3 and 0
 
  • #9
## f(-{1\over2}) = 0 ## ? :nb)
 
  • #10
[tex]\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}f(-\tfrac12 + \epsilon) = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} |\log(-\tfrac12 + \epsilon)| = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0}\log(\tfrac{2}{1 - 2\epsilon}) = ?[/tex]
 
  • #11
## f(-{1\over2}) = 0 ## ? :nb)
no I meant f(-1/2 +ε) =log(1+ε) =0 because -1/2 does not belong to the definition domain
 
  • #12
[tex]\lim_{\epsilon \to 0}f(-\tfrac12 + \epsilon) = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0} |\log(-\tfrac12 + \epsilon)| = \lim_{\epsilon \to 0}\log(\tfrac{2}{1 - 2\epsilon}) = ?[/tex]
log(2)
 
  • #13
log(2)
but sorry just one question
lim f(-1/2 + epsilon)= lim |log(-1/2+epsilon)|=lim -log(-1/2+ epsilon)=lim log(2/(2epsilon-1)) I think there us a small problem with the sign no?
 
  • #14
What is ##\bigl |\log {1\over 2} \bigr |## ?
 
  • #15
because -1/2 does not belong to the definition domain
Correct, but does it make any difference for the Fourier series ? Do you calculate something different for ##\ (-{1\over 2}, 2]\ ## than for ##\ [-{1\over 2}, 2)\ ## ?
 
  • #16
Correct, but does it make any difference for the Fourier series ? Do you calculate something different for ##\ (-{1\over 2}, 2]\ ## than for ##\ [-{1\over 2}, 2)\ ## ?
not does not
 
  • #17
What is ##\bigl |\log {1\over 2} \bigr |## ?
|log(2)|=log(2)
 
  • #18
Yes; I hope you got it right: ##\ \bigl |\log{1\over 2}\bigr | = |-\log 2\bigr | = \log 2 \ .##

So at ##x=2## the Fourier sum jumps from ##\log 3 ## to ##\log 2 ##. What's the average ?

##\ ##
 
  • Informative
  • Like
Likes hutchphd and Amaelle
  • #19
log(6)/2, thanks a million!
 
  • #20
So somehow the subtle difference between ranges ##\ (-{1\over 2}, 2]\ ## and ##\ [-{1\over 2}, 2)\ ## is 'lost in transformation' :rolleyes:

##\ ##
 
  • #21
So somehow the subtle difference between ranges ##\ (-{1\over 2}, 2]\ ## and ##\ [-{1\over 2}, 2)\ ## is 'lost in transformation' :rolleyes:

##\ ##
yes , thanks a million, that was a nice explanation!
 

Suggested for: Problem with the sum of a Fourier series

Replies
26
Views
920
Replies
1
Views
582
Replies
6
Views
412
Replies
2
Views
484
Replies
11
Views
564
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
23
Views
823
Back
Top