Problems in Statics Involving Moments related to rigid bodies

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around problems in statics involving moments related to rigid bodies. Participants are seeking assistance with specific problems from their coursework, focusing on the application of concepts such as force, angles, and moments in static equilibrium scenarios.

Discussion Character

  • Homework-related
  • Technical explanation
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant reports a discrepancy between their answer (225 lbs) and the book's answer (250 lbs) for a problem, indicating uncertainty in their calculations.
  • Another participant draws a comparison between their problem and a labeled problem (3.71), suggesting that they share a similar premise involving moments.
  • Concerns are raised about the direction of forces in a diagram, with a participant noting that one arrow points incorrectly.
  • A participant seeks clarification on how to set up an equation involving angles and distances, expressing confusion about their approach to part c of problem 3.71.
  • Another participant questions the determination of the angle that minimizes tension and suggests maximizing the perpendicular distance from the line of action of the force.
  • One participant confirms the correctness of an angle (53.1 degrees) as per the book's answer but questions the use of a specific distance in their calculations.
  • A participant discusses their calculations involving angles and distances in a different problem, expressing uncertainty about their results and seeking help with specific components of their answer.
  • Participants express a common theme of overlooking simple aspects of problems, indicating a shared experience of frustration in problem-solving.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not appear to reach a consensus on the solutions to their problems, with multiple competing views and approaches presented throughout the discussion. Uncertainties and differing interpretations of angles and distances are evident.

Contextual Notes

Some participants mention specific angles and distances derived from their calculations, but there are indications of potential errors in these values. The discussion includes references to various mathematical setups and assumptions that are not fully resolved.

jnbfive
Messages
46
Reaction score
0
I have a couple problems that I can't seem to get.

The first I'm really close, I can tell, because my professor did one that was similar in class. The answer the book gives is 250 lbs, I'm coming up with 225.

The second I think is similar to another problem he did in class but I'm not quite sure. I'll post it in the next reply.
 

Attachments

  • Problem 3.10.1.jpg
    Problem 3.10.1.jpg
    37.8 KB · Views: 1,894
  • Problem 3.10 work.1.jpg
    Problem 3.10 work.1.jpg
    30.1 KB · Views: 1,217
  • Problem 3.71.1.jpg
    Problem 3.71.1.jpg
    36.7 KB · Views: 1,260
Physics news on Phys.org
This is the problem that I think is similar to the one labeled 3.71. I just want to know if I'm correct in my assumption the two problems have a similar premise.
 

Attachments

  • Problem 3.71_similar.1.jpg
    Problem 3.71_similar.1.jpg
    28.5 KB · Views: 920
jnbfive said:
This is the problem that I think is similar to the one labeled 3.71. I just want to know if I'm correct in my assumption the two problems have a similar premise.
The premise seems similar (Moment = force times perpendicular distance). For the force on the nails in part 1, one of your arrows points in the wrong direction.
 
I need help on part c of 3.71. I have the angle from b, which I believe I need to use. I originally thought that the way to set it up would be

86.2 = x(22.36)*sin(53.1)

^22.36 coming from the sqrt of 17.6^2+ 13.8^2

Any help on what I'm doing wrong would be appreciated.
 
jnbfive said:
I need help on part c of 3.71. I have the angle from b, which I believe I need to use.
how did you determine the angle that requires the min tension?
I originally thought that the way to set it up would be

86.2 = x(22.36)*sin(53.1)
check angle and position vector
^22.36 coming from the sqrt of 17.6^2+ 13.8^2
looks like it should be 15.2^2 + 13.8^2
Any help on what I'm doing wrong would be appreciated.
Note that if you are trying to minimize the tension, you want to maximize the perpendicular distance from the line of action of the force. Forget the r*T*sin theta approach.
 
*I took the inverse tangent of 11.4/15.2

*The angle of 53.1 is correct; that's the answer the book got.

*Why only 15.2?

*Thanks
 
If I could actually ask for help in another question, any help would be appreciated.

Excuse my chicken scratch work. I solved for the angle at which the force is acting at, which is 30 degrees in the xz plane. I solve for the actually distance from the x-axis that said force was, which was about 387 mm or 100*sqrt(15). Given this I solved for the distance from the origin, 100*sqrt(19). I found my force, the set up a cross product. My answers are listed as such. I have the i vector correct, j is off by 8 (should be 22) and k is off by 1 (should be 39.1). I feel as if I'm really close to this one, was just wondering what I'm doing wrong here.
 

Attachments

  • Problem 3.94.1.jpg
    Problem 3.94.1.jpg
    53 KB · Views: 847
  • Work for 3.94.jpg
    Work for 3.94.jpg
    17.9 KB · Views: 733
jnbfive said:
*I took the inverse tangent of 11.4/15.2

*The angle of 53.1 is correct; that's the answer the book got.

*Why only 15.2?

*Thanks
I was incorrectly thinking that the angle was 45 degrees, but it appears that the 53.1 is the correct angle that the tension force makes with the horizontal. But that is not the angle in between the force and the position vector for the minimum tension. . That angle is 90 degrees. Also, although I could easily be wrong, the distance to use is root((15.2)^2 + (11.4)^2)) + 2.4 = 21.4. So I get T_min = 86.2/21.4 = 4N.
 
I'm amazed at my ability to overlook the simple things in problems. Many thanks for your help with that.
 
  • #10
In response to my above comment, I really realize that I overlook things too much. 3.94 I have the j and k of the force couple system (use the force that I obtained when breaking down the 220 N in the cross product. Duh.) Somehow I can't seem to get i. Any help would be appreciated.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
5K