Problems with numerical illiteracy

  • Thread starter Thread starter torquerotates
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Numerical
AI Thread Summary
In upper division math courses, particularly in linear algebra and probability, proficiency in mental arithmetic is not a critical requirement. Students with strong spatial skills, logic, and a solid grasp of algebra can succeed even if they struggle with basic calculations. The focus in advanced mathematics is on understanding abstract concepts and creative problem-solving rather than quick mental computation. Instances of professors making arithmetic errors during lectures highlight that even experienced mathematicians can falter in basic calculations, emphasizing that the ability to think critically and grasp complex ideas is far more important than speed in arithmetic. Concerns about being judged for arithmetic skills are common, but the academic community generally values conceptual understanding over computational speed.
torquerotates
Messages
207
Reaction score
0
How good do I have to be with numbers in upper division math( esp. linear algebra and probability)? I have pretty good spatial skills, logic and algebra( I can solve differential equations quickly with little error). I got mostly A's in lower division math and, if it counts for anything, physics courses. Yet when it comes to basic stuff like multiplying numbers mentally and correctly keeping track of decimal places in basic operations, I'm sunk. I mean, it's not that I can do the math(though some of it isn't awfully intuitive), its just that I'm not quick like most math/science majors. My little brother can do arithmetic faster than me and he got a D in Calc. =(.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, dude, get that stuff out of your head. That's what calculators are for. As sad as it sounds, there are more important things than arithmetic.

Every now and then when we do a numerical problem in one of my physics classes (I'll be a senior now), it comes to multiplying something non-trivial and the class gets a collective brain-fart and it takes us like 5 minutes to do any adding or multiplying, even the professor gets stuck.

Don't worry about it. Calculus is more important than arithmetic.
 
Agreed with WarPhalange. How quickly you can do mental arithmetic does not measure how you'll do in upper level math courses.

You need to know how to think abstractly, grasp concepts, and be creative, not multiply 323.43*45.7 in your head.
 
Don't worry--even some of the math professors can get those wrong during lectures. I remember a few times in number theory when my professor said 56 is 7 mod 2, implying that if you divide 56 by 7, you get a remainder of 2. It took a few seconds for a class to realize the fallacy in his statement, and it was actually funny because somebody who can do algebraic topology can still get the multiplication table wrong.

But as I've said, it was actually "funny", and nobody thought it was ridiculous or crazy (e.g. "OMG, he can't do multiplication and he's our professor!"). The upper division math classes stresses on understanding abstract concepts rather than being able to compute arithmetic quickly. People won't look down on you for not getting correct arithmetic, except for some misguided people who THINK math is all about arithmetic (but we all have to deal with these people in different way).
 
PieceOfPi said:
... People won't look down on you for not getting correct arithmetic, except for some misguided people who THINK math is all about arithmetic (but we all have to deal with these people in different way).

That's the worst part of telling people I'm a math major. I'm the first one asked when big number arithmetic needs to be done.
 
alligatorman said:
you Need To Know How To Think Abstractly, Grasp Concepts, And Be Creative, Not Multiply 323.43*45.7 In Your Head.

14780.751

edit: that's weird. For an exercise in being creative, anyone want to conjecture why that quote altered the capitalization at the beginning of each word?
 
Hey, I am Andreas from Germany. I am currently 35 years old and I want to relearn math and physics. This is not one of these regular questions when it comes to this matter. So... I am very realistic about it. I know that there are severe contraints when it comes to selfstudy compared to a regular school and/or university (structure, peers, teachers, learning groups, tests, access to papers and so on) . I will never get a job in this field and I will never be taken serious by "real"...
TL;DR Summary: I want to do a PhD in applied math but I hate group theory, is this a big problem? Hello, I am a second-year math and physics double major with a minor in data science. I just finished group theory (today actually), and it was my least favorite class in all of university so far. It doesn't interest me, and I am also very bad at it compared to other math courses I have done. The other courses I have done are calculus I-III, ODEs, Linear Algebra, and Prob/Stats. Is it a...

Similar threads

Back
Top