Problems with parallel vectors

  • Thread starter Thread starter deanchhsw
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Parallel Vectors
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around finding points A on line L1 and B on line L2 such that the vector AB is parallel to the cross product of the direction vectors of L1 and L2. The direction vectors are identified as (2, -1, 3) for L1 and (-3, 2, -1) for L2, leading to a cross product of (-5, -7, 1). The user struggles to find specific values for parameters m and t that satisfy the conditions for parallelism, noting inconsistencies in the equations derived from equating components of vector AB to the cross product. Clarification is sought on the interpretation of the problem, particularly regarding the parallelism condition and the use of the term "product of direction vectors." The user expresses frustration over the complexity of the problem, indicating a need for further assistance.
deanchhsw
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
There are two lines:

L1 : x = 1 + 2t ; y = 2 - t ; z = -1 + 3t.
L2: x = 2 - 3m ; y = 2m ; z = 1 - m.

The problem states to find a general point on A on L1 and a general point B on L2, and then find the vector AB from those points.

Hence,

Vector AB = ( -3m - 2t - 1 , 2m + t - 2, -m -3t +2).

Then, the problem states to find specific points A and B such that vector AB is parallel to the product of direction vectors of lines L1 and L2.

using determinants, the product of direction vectors come out to be (-5,-7,1). I'm pretty sure it is. This also means that direction vector of vector AB has to be either (-5, -7, 1) or scalar multiples of it. But when I equate

-3m-2t-1 = -5
2m + t - 2 = -7
-m -3t +2 = 1

and do simultaneous equation, the value for m and t doesn't come out to be right. if it works for x and y, it doesnt' work for z, and so on.

Then, how do you solve this problem? I have spent nearly 20 minutes on this, and it's driving me crazy! nuts! math genies, please help :(
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
I'm sorry, what do you mean by the "product of direction vectors"?

The dot product of two vectors is a number so that can't be it.

The cross product (since you talk of the "determinant" that probably is it) of two vectors is perpendicular to both vectors. The vector between two points on the two lines is in the same plane as the two lines- it can't be perpendicular to them and so can't be parallel to the cross product.
 
I mean this

Here's what I meant by prodcut of direction vectors.
direction vector L1 = (2,-1,3)
direction vector L2 = (-3,2,-1)

Thus D.V. L1 * D.V. L2 = det( i j k ) = (-5,-7,1)
.........( 2 -1 3 )
........ ( -3 2 -1 )

forgive me for using parenthesis where abstract value sign should be.
At any rate, that's what I meant by product.

if you pictured it correctly that it's the "cross product", that's what I originally figured: that since product of direction vector is perpendicular to the lines connecting the two "general points", it cannot be parallel. but I can't imagine that the problem is flawed because it is coming straight out of the infamous International Baccalaureate internal assessment sheet! So, here's the dilemma. I think I'm interpreting the problem in a wrong direction.

Since I really can't see what to do, I'll just present the full problem here:

Consider the two lines:

L1 : x = 1 + 2t ; y = 2 - t ; z = -1 + 3t.
L2: x = 2 - 3m ; y = 2m ; z = 1 - m.

4) Given that l-1 and l-2 are direction vectors for lines L1 and L2, find the vector product l-1 x l-2.

5) Taking a general point A on L1 and a general point B on L2, find the vector AB.

6) Find points A and B such that AB is parallel to l-1 x l-2.

7) Find the magnitude of vector AB.

...

As noted before, vector product, if I did things correctly, should be (-5,-7,1).
Number 5's answer, I believed, was
Vector AB = ( -3m - 2t - 1 , 2m + t - 2, -m -3t +2).
As I stated before in the question.

Number 6 is the point where I have trouble with- the way it is worded, it sounds as if two points each in Line L1 and L2 are supposed to be parallel to their direction vector products. I stared at the problem for 20 minutes, and yelled out, "THIS DOES NOT MAKE SENSE."

I'm really sorry that I had to resort to actually presenting a problem, but
please understand that I tried my best and even more.

Thank you so much.
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top