Producing H_{2} Gas: Na + H_{2}O Reaction

  • Thread starter Thread starter Punkyc7
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Gas Reaction
AI Thread Summary
To determine the volume of hydrogen gas produced from the reaction of sodium with water, it is essential to calculate the number of moles of H2 generated. The balanced equation indicates that 2 moles of Na yield 1 mole of H2, meaning that 1.74 moles of Na will produce 0.87 moles of H2. The ideal gas law can then be applied to find the volume of H2 at the specified conditions of 280 K and 96 kPa. It is crucial to consider stoichiometric coefficients in these calculations for accurate results. Understanding stoichiometry is key to solving such chemical reaction problems effectively.
Punkyc7
Messages
415
Reaction score
0
1. How many liters of hydrogen gas will be produced at 280 K and 96 kPa if 1.74 of Na reacts with excess water according to the following equation.

2Na + 2H_{2}O \rightarrow2NaOH + H_{2}


Im gussing I am going to have to find the number of moles of H_{2} before I can do anything.

So I am thinking that since there is 1.74 mol of Na that is going to be the number of moles of H_{2}. Is that right?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use [noparse] and [/noparse] tags to format subscripts and superscripts (so [noparse]H3O+[/noparse] yields H3O+) - don't use inline LaTeX for formatting single characters.

You are wrong, but not far from the correct answer. You forgot to take stoichiometric coefficients into account. Please read about stoichiometric calculations.
 
Thread 'Confusion regarding a chemical kinetics problem'
TL;DR Summary: cannot find out error in solution proposed. [![question with rate laws][1]][1] Now the rate law for the reaction (i.e reaction rate) can be written as: $$ R= k[N_2O_5] $$ my main question is, WHAT is this reaction equal to? what I mean here is, whether $$k[N_2O_5]= -d[N_2O_5]/dt$$ or is it $$k[N_2O_5]= -1/2 \frac{d}{dt} [N_2O_5] $$ ? The latter seems to be more apt, as the reaction rate must be -1/2 (disappearance rate of N2O5), which adheres to the stoichiometry of the...
I don't get how to argue it. i can prove: evolution is the ability to adapt, whether it's progression or regression from some point of view, so if evolution is not constant then animal generations couldn`t stay alive for a big amount of time because when climate is changing this generations die. but they dont. so evolution is constant. but its not an argument, right? how to fing arguments when i only prove it.. analytically, i guess it called that (this is indirectly related to biology, im...
Back
Top