Is the product of dense sets a dense set in a metric space?

  • Thread starter Thread starter I<3Gauss
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Product Sets
I<3Gauss
Messages
14
Reaction score
0
Just a quick question. If Q is a dense set of a metric space X, and P is a dense set of a metric space Y, then is Q x P a dense set of X x Y? I am fairly sure this is the case.

If this is true, then I want to use this statement to show that the open sets of the product of finite number of separable metric spaces can be written as the union of countably many balls centered around elements in the product of the dense sets.

Ultimately, this will show that the open sets of the product of finite number of metric spaces is a subset of the product sigma algebra of the separable metric spaces. (Each separable metric space is generated by a countable set of neighborhoods centered around elements in each metric spaces' corresponding dense set)

Does this argument make sense?

Thanks!EDIT1: Oops, forgot an important part. The metric on the product space is the standard product metric. Specifically, if x and y are elements of the product space, then p(x,y) = max (p1(x1,y1), p2(x2,y2),..., pn(xn,yn)), where x=(x1,x2,x3,x4,...,xn) y=(y1,y2,y3,...,yn) and pn(x,y) is the metric on the metric space Xn.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes. The argument is just a definition chase.

Let (x,y) be a point in the product X x Y, and fix an r > 0. We need to find a point (p,q) in P x Q so that (p,q) lies in the ball B( (x,y); r). Since P is dense in X, we may find a point p in P so that p is in B(x;r). Similarly, find a q in Q so that q is in B(y;r). Now d((x,y), (p,q)) is by definition the maximum of d(x,p) and d(y,q), which are both less than r by assumption, so (p,q) is in B((x,y); r).

This shows that any point in the product is in the closure of PxQ, and so PxQ is dense in X x Y.
 
Maybe you can try the more general result that the closure of a product is the product of the closures.
 
A sphere as topological manifold can be defined by gluing together the boundary of two disk. Basically one starts assigning each disk the subspace topology from ##\mathbb R^2## and then taking the quotient topology obtained by gluing their boundaries. Starting from the above definition of 2-sphere as topological manifold, shows that it is homeomorphic to the "embedded" sphere understood as subset of ##\mathbb R^3## in the subspace topology.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
2K
Back
Top