Proff of half infinite intervals through set theory

congtongsat
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Problem:
We define half infinite intervals as follows:
(a, \infty) = {x\in R | x>a};
[a, \infty) = {x\in R | x\geqa};

Prove that:
(i) (a, \infty) \subseteq [b, \infty) \Leftrightarrow a\geqb,
(ii) [a, \infty) \subseteq (b, \infty) \Leftrightarrow a>b.

I've got pretty much no idea how to do this. Then again I've been struggling at this for a couple hours and my mind doesn't work particularly well at 2:25 am PST. Help would be greatly appreciated on this.

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
congtongsat said:
Problem:
We define half infinite intervals as follows:
(a, \infty) = {x\in R | x>a};
[a, \infty) = {x\in R | x\geqa};

Prove that:
(i) (a, \infty) \subseteq [b, \infty) \Leftrightarrow a\geqb,
(ii) [a, \infty) \subseteq (b, \infty) \Leftrightarrow a>b.

I've got pretty much no idea how to do this. Then again I've been struggling at this for a couple hours and my mind doesn't work particularly well at 2:25 am PST. Help would be greatly appreciated on this.

Thanks.
You prove that A\subseteq B by proving that any member of A is a member of B.
If a\geq b, then for any member, x, of (a, \infty), x> a\ge b so x> b and therefore x\in [b, \infty).

The converse is a litlle harder because we are looking at (a, \infty) rather than [a,\infty), for all \epsilon> 0, a+ \epsilon> aso a+ \epsilon\in (a, \infty). If (a,\infty)\subseteq [b, \infty) and so a+\epsilon\ge b. Taking the limit as \epsilon goes to 0, a\le b.<br /> <br /> (ii) is actually simpler.
 
much appreciated. cleared things up for me.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top