Projectile Motion - Hitting an edge

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on finding the initial velocity (v0) needed for a projectile to hit a corner, given the distance (L) and angle (a). Participants suggest using the standard projectile motion equations to eliminate time and derive the expression for v0. One user shares their initial confusion about the problem and acknowledges the complexity of solutions outside a specific angle range. The conversation highlights the common experience of overthinking problems before realizing simpler solutions exist. Overall, the thread emphasizes collaboration and problem-solving in physics.
Mcoroklo
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I've made a picture of the situation:

http://img11.imageshack.us/img11/7177/drawing1m.jpg


I need to find the expression for the start velocity v0. The ball should exactly hit the corner.

The function should have the distance L (Which both is x-distance and y-distance to the point) and the angle a as variables.

We can ignore air resistance.

Homework Equations



Normal projectile motion equations:
x=(v0*cos(a)*t
y=(v0*sin(a)*t-1/2*g*t^2)

vx=v0*cos(a)
vy=v0*sin(a)-gt

The Attempt at a Solution


I've been sitting with he assignment for 2 hours - trying both creative and stupid solutions!

First attempt was setting x=L and y=L and find the expression for v0.

I've also trying to set the v=0, but afterwards finding out the ball speed doesn't have to be zero.

Nothing has worked out so far.

Any suggestions?

Thanks alot.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
Might try this approach...

How far below the corner would the projectile strike if you aimed directly at the corner?
 
Hi Mcoroklo, welcome to PF>

Your two starting equations are correct. Use the first equation to eliminate time in the second. That should give you what you need.
 
... Thanks a lot!

I guess you guys know the feeling. A lot of time spend on outrageous thoughts, afterwards finding the solution is way simpler.
I actually had your solution to Kuruman, checked for input (40deg and 10m). It gave complex numbers and I tried another approach. Ofcourse it should give complex numbers for each angle outside the span of 45-90..

Thanks a lot to both of you.

Looking forward to participate in the forum, hopefully helping people to! :-)
 
Mcoroklo said:
... Thanks a lot!

I guess you guys know the feeling. A lot of time spend on outrageous thoughts, afterwards finding the solution is way simpler.
I actually had your solution to Kuruman, checked for input (40deg and 10m). It gave complex numbers and I tried another approach. Ofcourse it should give complex numbers for each angle outside the span of 45-90..

Thanks a lot to both of you.

Looking forward to participate in the forum, hopefully helping people to! :-)

Actually I read the problem wrong initially, I thought you were trying to solve for the angle given an initial velocity. But, if it helped, I am happy. The other posters approach is easier, my proposal was a conceptual way that might help with other similar problems. And it may have helped eliminate unecessary stuff if you were guessing and checking with numbers.
 
Last edited:
I multiplied the values first without the error limit. Got 19.38. rounded it off to 2 significant figures since the given data has 2 significant figures. So = 19. For error I used the above formula. It comes out about 1.48. Now my question is. Should I write the answer as 19±1.5 (rounding 1.48 to 2 significant figures) OR should I write it as 19±1. So in short, should the error have same number of significant figures as the mean value or should it have the same number of decimal places as...
Thread 'Collision of a bullet on a rod-string system: query'
In this question, I have a question. I am NOT trying to solve it, but it is just a conceptual question. Consider the point on the rod, which connects the string and the rod. My question: just before and after the collision, is ANGULAR momentum CONSERVED about this point? Lets call the point which connects the string and rod as P. Why am I asking this? : it is clear from the scenario that the point of concern, which connects the string and the rod, moves in a circular path due to the string...
Thread 'A cylinder connected to a hanging mass'
Let's declare that for the cylinder, mass = M = 10 kg Radius = R = 4 m For the wall and the floor, Friction coeff = ##\mu## = 0.5 For the hanging mass, mass = m = 11 kg First, we divide the force according to their respective plane (x and y thing, correct me if I'm wrong) and according to which, cylinder or the hanging mass, they're working on. Force on the hanging mass $$mg - T = ma$$ Force(Cylinder) on y $$N_f + f_w - Mg = 0$$ Force(Cylinder) on x $$T + f_f - N_w = Ma$$ There's also...
Back
Top