Projectile motion with air resistance

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around modeling the trajectory of a projectile subject to air resistance, specifically focusing on the drag force that is proportional to the square of the velocity. Participants explore the implications of this drag force on the equations of motion and the resulting trajectory.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the formulation of differential equations to model the motion, with some expressing uncertainty about their understanding of differential equations. There are attempts to derive expressions for velocity and position over time, while others question the assumptions made regarding the nature of drag and its effects on the trajectory.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants providing hints and suggestions for approaching the problem. Some have shared their attempts at deriving equations, while others have noted potential mistakes or oversights in their reasoning. There is a recognition of the complexity of the problem, particularly in relation to the effects of drag.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention constraints such as the assumption of drag being purely horizontal in some cases and the challenges of integrating equations that involve drag. There is also a reference to the limitations of their previous knowledge in differential equations, which may affect their ability to solve the problem fully.

matineesuxxx
Messages
77
Reaction score
6

Homework Statement



Model the trajectory of a projectile with an initial velocity [itex]v_0[/itex] that is subject to the force of drag.

Homework Equations



[itex]F_{\text{d}} = \frac{1}{2}C_{\text{d}}\rho\text{A}(v(t))^2[/itex]

[itex]v_x(t) = v_{0x} + \int_{t_0}^t a_x(t')\mathrm{d}t'[/itex]

The Attempt at a Solution



I really have no clue how to tackle this problem. I'm sort of leaning towards the idea of a differential equation solution, however I only have a small amount of DE's under my belt from calc 2.

I have done a fair amount of searching online, however every page that I've seen about this problem assumes drag force is linearly dependent on speed, or even assuming drag is constant. Would I gain enough insight solving the problem in which drag force is linear to make headway on the real life scenario?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
If you replace F in your first equation with one of Newton's laws, you get a differential equation with the velocity and its time-derivative.
 
You need to express acceleration as an equation. mfb gave you a hint for how to do this.

Then note that acceleration = dv/dt, but in this case, acceleration will be a function of velocity:

dv/dt = a(v)

to deal with this rearrange it to:

dv/a(v) = dt

then integrate both sides to get velocity versus time (don't forget to include a constant of integration after integrating). You'll need to repeat this process again and integrate to get position versus time.
 
Last edited:
Thanks a lot, both of you. It's been a while since I've done DE's, so I didn't see what now seems so obvious!

So I get,

[itex]F_{\text{d}} = -\frac{1}{2}C_{\text{d}}\rho \text{A}v^2 = m\frac{\text{d}v}{\text{d}t}[/itex]

which then leads me to,

$$ v(t) = \frac{2m}{K_1 + C_{\text{d}}\rho \text{A}t}$$,

where [itex]K_1 = C_{\text{d}}\rho \text{A}mK_0[/itex] and [itex]K_0[/itex] is just the constant of integration.
 
Last edited:
rcgldr said:
You'll need to repeat this process again and integrate to get position versus time.

when I use $$ x(t) = x_0 + \int_{t_0}^{t_1} \frac{2mv_{0x}}{C_d \rho A v_{0x}t + 2m}dt $$

to get my displacement vs time graph I get $$x(t) = \frac{2m}{C_d \rho A}\ln\left(\frac{2m+C_d\rho A v_{0x}t}{2m}\right) $$

but this reduces to 0, not [itex]x(t) = v_{0x}t[/itex] if there is no drag. So is this correct, or have I made a mistake?

[edit] Sorry, I neglected to take a limit as c, p, or A went to zero
 
Last edited:
rcgldr said:
I'm thinking velocity should be:

$$ v(t) = \frac{1}{\frac{1}{v_0} - \frac{t}{C_{\text{d}}\rho \text{A}}}$$

Note that at t = 0, v = v0,and at t = ∞, v = 0.
Here's what I did:

let [itex]\mu = C_d \rho A[/itex] so then [itex]-\frac{1}{2}\mu v^2 = m\frac{dv}{dt} \implies v\mu t = 2m - vK[/itex].

so [itex]v = \frac{2m}{\mu t + K}[/itex], where [itex]v(0) = v_{0x} \implies K = \frac{2m}{v_{0x}}[/itex] so then I end up with $$ v = \frac{2mv_{0x}}{2m+\mu v_{0x}t} = \frac{2mv_{0x}}{2m + C_d \rho A v_{0x}t}$$

which still reduces to the correct equations when taking limits, and we don't have a nasty asymptote.
 
Sorry for the previous post, I wasn't paying attention to the fact that the force opposes velocity and should be negative: m dv/dt = -1/2 u v^2 . What you have looks correct.

If the drag is zero, then the integral using CdpA to produce x(t) is undefined as you end up with something in the form of (1/0) ln(1) => 0/0. So if CdpA == 0, the integral becomes:

$$ x(t) = x_0 + \int_{t_0}^{t_1} \frac{2mv_0}{0 + 2m}dt $$
$$ x(t) = x_0 + \int_{t_0}^{t_1} v_0dt $$
 
Last edited:
rcgldr said:
Sorry for the previous post, I wasn't paying attention to the fact that the force opposes velocity and should be negative: m dv/dt = -1/2 u v^2 . What you have looks correct.

If the drag is zero, then the integral using CdpA to produce x(t) is undefined as you end up with something in the form of (1/0) ln(...). So if CdpA == 0, the integral becomes:

$$ x(t) = x_0 + \int_{t_0}^{t_1} \frac{2mv_0}{0 + 2m}dt $$
$$ x(t) = x_0 + \int_{t_0}^{t_1} v_0dt $$

No worries, I actually forgot to add the negative sign in the first occurrence of the force equation, so i made the same mistake :). And in regards to the (1/0)ln(...), it ends up as 0/0 so just use L'Hopital's Rule and you still end up with x(t) = (v_0x)t, same goes for m -> infinity
 
Last edited:
  • #10
matineesuxxx said:
Thanks for all the help! Here's a neat interactive graph I did up for it:
So you enhanced the equations to a 2d situation? I'm not sure I understand the graphs. I assume the graph shows the X Y plane with gravity exerting a force in the -Y direction and drag always opposing velocity (both x and y components), however the peak height reached in the graphs for the object remains the same regardless of drag. It appears the calculator adjusts the initial angle of velocity to do this, but it would seem that if drag is sufficiently large, the peak would be less than the zero drag case, even if the initial velocity was vertical.
 
  • #11
The maximum height reached would not change given any air drag, so long as the drag force is purely horizontal, which is one condition of my problem, although I neglected to mention that. And you the graphs are a trajectory, horizontal vs vertical distance.
 
  • #12
matineesuxxx said:
The maximum height reached would not change given any air drag, so long as the drag for is purely horizontal.
Ok, so an imaginary case where drag is only horizontal. I was expecting something like this:

http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/ProjectileWithAirDrag

It might be interesting to plot a postion versus time graph (straight line for zero drag non-zero velocity).
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
  • #13
rcgldr said:
Ok, so an imaginary case where drag is only horizontal. I was expecting something like this:

http://demonstrations.wolfram.com/ProjectileWithAirDrag

It might be interesting to plot a postion versus time graph (straight line for zero drag non-zero velocity).

Yes. I wanted to originally have drag act as it really would, but I have no clue how to solve a differential equation of the form [itex]q(x) = \frac{dy}{dx} + p(x)y^2[/itex].
 
  • #14
That wolfram article is using an imaginary drag factor that varies with velocity as opposed to velocity squared.

I though about parametric approach, but apparently the equations involve v and vx and vy:

$$ m\ \frac{dv_x}{dt} = - \ c\ v \ {v_x} $$
$$ m\ \frac{dv_y}{dt} = -m\ g \ - \ c\ v \ {v_y} $$

based on this pdf article that uses numerical integration to solve the problem:

topic01.pdf

If the object is falling vertically, then there's no x component, and the equations can be solved:

wiki free fall with air resistance .htm
 
Last edited:
  • #15
matineesuxxx said:
Yes. I wanted to originally have drag act as it really would, but I have no clue how to solve a differential equation of the form [itex]q(x) = \frac{dy}{dx} + p(x)y^2[/itex].
Do it numerically.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
5K
Replies
19
Views
3K
Replies
26
Views
2K