Projectile Motion's relationship with Kinetic Energy and Potential Energy

AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on calculating the range of a projectile launched from a ramp using principles of kinetic and potential energy. The initial velocity is derived from the equation PE = KE, leading to the formula vx = √(2*g*hr) for the x-component of velocity. To determine the time of flight, the equation Δy = vy + 0.5gt^2 is used, resulting in t = √{(2*Δy)/g}. The user questions the validity of using Δx = vx*t for range calculation, expressing concern about it resembling an average velocity equation. Ultimately, they conclude that the distance formula d = v(initial)*t + 1/2*a*t^2 is the correct approach, confirming their understanding of the problem.
Whakataku
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
Imagine a ramp setup on top of a tall table. The height Δy is measured. To find the initial velocity at the instant the ball leaves the ramp, I set up the kinetic energy and potential energy equal to each other to find the initial velocity of the x component.

PE = KE
m*g*(hr) = 0.5*m*v^2
where hr is the height of the ramp and v is initial velocity (x-component)

solving for vx (x-component velocity), I got:
vx = √(2*g*hr)

To get the time for the object's time in flight:
y'-y= vy + 0.5gt^2
Δy= vy + 0.5gt^2, where Δy is the height from the ground to the ramp.
since θ= 0° I found t to be:
t = √{ (2*∆y)/g }

Now my question is how do I find the range of this object?
I started out with Δx = vx*t ; where vx is the initial x-component velocity... is that even right?
I'm hesitant to use it because written as Δx/t, it looks like an average velocity equation.
Furthermore, in Wikipedia I saw the equation

d= {v*cos(\Theta)}/g * [v*sin(\Theta) + sqrt(v*sin(\Theta)^2+2g*y)]

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Range_of_a_projectile"
under uneven ground

but the problem is I don't have final velocity... or can I calculate the final velocity with the givens... if so how??

Could anyone please nudge me in the right direction to find Δx?

thanks.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think I solved it... duh.

in the distance formula
d = v(initial)*t + 1/2*a*t^2.v(initial) and time is already attained and the the a acceleration is -9.81m/s^2
Correct me if I'm wrong.
 
Last edited:
Hi there, im studying nanoscience at the university in Basel. Today I looked at the topic of intertial and non-inertial reference frames and the existence of fictitious forces. I understand that you call forces real in physics if they appear in interplay. Meaning that a force is real when there is the "actio" partner to the "reactio" partner. If this condition is not satisfied the force is not real. I also understand that if you specifically look at non-inertial reference frames you can...
This has been discussed many times on PF, and will likely come up again, so the video might come handy. Previous threads: https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/is-a-treadmill-incline-just-a-marketing-gimmick.937725/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/work-done-running-on-an-inclined-treadmill.927825/ https://www.physicsforums.com/threads/how-do-we-calculate-the-energy-we-used-to-do-something.1052162/
I have recently been really interested in the derivation of Hamiltons Principle. On my research I found that with the term ##m \cdot \frac{d}{dt} (\frac{dr}{dt} \cdot \delta r) = 0## (1) one may derivate ##\delta \int (T - V) dt = 0## (2). The derivation itself I understood quiet good, but what I don't understand is where the equation (1) came from, because in my research it was just given and not derived from anywhere. Does anybody know where (1) comes from or why from it the...

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Back
Top