Proof by Induction: 3 & 5 Rouble Notes for All N>7

  • Thread starter Thread starter duke_nemmerle
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

This discussion focuses on proving by induction that any whole number of Roubles greater than 7 can be expressed using only 3 Rouble and 5 Rouble notes. The proof begins with the base case of n = 8 and extends to n = 9, demonstrating that if P(n-2) holds, then P(n+1) is also valid. The use of strong induction is emphasized, where the assumption of P(1) through P(n) leads to the conclusion that P(n+1) is true. The pattern of coefficients for a and b is also noted, reinforcing the validity of the induction process.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with the concept of strong induction
  • Basic knowledge of linear combinations in number theory
  • Ability to manipulate equations involving integers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in detail
  • Explore strong induction and its applications in proofs
  • Learn about linear combinations and their significance in number theory
  • Practice problems involving coin change and similar combinatorial proofs
USEFUL FOR

Students of mathematics, particularly those studying number theory and proof techniques, as well as educators looking for examples of induction in action.

duke_nemmerle
Messages
50
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


Show, by induction, that for all whole number of Roubles greater than 7, the amount can be given without change by using only 3 rouble and 5 rouble notes.

Homework Equations


In other words for all n \in N, n > 7, there exist a, b \in N such that n = 5a + 3b

The Attempt at a Solution


This is true for n = 8

I'm wondering if I can't use strong induction. I've noticed that all of these n's appear to be writable with a \in \{0,1,2\} while letting b take on any value, and that when you express the integers greater than 7 in order the a's when thus constrained go 1, 0, 2, 1, 0, 2, etc and each time around the b increments by one for each repetition of a. So, I don't know if I can weasel something out of this like to go from n to n+1 means either going from 1 to 0, 0 to 2, or 2 to 1 in a with the associated incrementation, but I just get the feeling that this isn't the way to go. It seems I'm missing something easier.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Looks like you're on the right track, and since it's true for n=8, it's true for n=18, n=28, etc. And if it's true for n=9...
 
I think the real trick on this was to use strong induction and notice that P(n+1) is implied by assuming P(1)...P(n) are true. Specifically, if P(n-2) is true, then P(n+1) is implied because it is three more than it, so if P(n-2) were written as 5a+3b, P(n+1) is 5a + 3(b+1)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K