Proof by induction of a problem

  • Thread starter Thread starter marcin w
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving a mathematical assertion by induction, specifically the equality involving summations of fractions. The user defines a summation notation and then presents their induction proof, starting with a base case that they claim is true. They outline their approach to prove the assertion for k+1, detailing the steps taken to manipulate the summation expressions. Feedback is requested on whether the definitions from part 1 should have been utilized in part 2, and additional insights are provided regarding the handling of terms in the induction step. The conversation emphasizes the importance of clarity and correctness in mathematical proofs.
marcin w
Messages
12
Reaction score
0
I'm working out a problem that requires me to proof a result by induction. I have worked out what I think is a correct proof, but I would like for somebody to look over it and give me feedback.
Part 1: Give a reasonable definition of the symbol \sum_{k = m}^{m + n}{a}_{k}
I first define:
<br /> \sum_{k = m}^{m}{a}_{k} = {a }_{ m}<br />
Then assuming I have defined \sum_{k = m}^{n}{a}_{k} for a fixed n >= m, I further defined:
\sum_{ k=m}^{n+1 } {a }_{k } =( \sum_{k=m }^{ n} { a}_{ k} )+ { a}_{n+1 }

Part 2 requires me to prove by induction that for all n >= 1, we have the assertion (call it A(n)):
\sum_{k=n+1 }^{ 2n} \frac{1 }{k } = \sum_{ m=1}^{ 2n} \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1 } }{m }

I approach this problem as I would have any proof by induction. The base case A(1) is true so I won't write it out here. Now, assuming the assertion is true for some k:
\frac{ 1}{ k+1} + \frac{1 }{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2k} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2k+1 } }{ 2k}

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to - \frac{ 1}{2k }.
I have to show that A(k+1) is true:
(*)\frac{ 1}{ k+2} + \frac{1 }{k+3 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2(k+1)} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2(k+1)+1 } }{ 2(k+1)}

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to - \frac{1 }{ 2(k+1)}
Starting with A(k), I add \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2} - \frac{ 1}{ k+1} to each side and obtain:

\frac{ 1}{k+1 } + \frac{ 1}{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{2k } - \frac{1 }{k+1 } + \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } =1- \frac{ 1}{ 2} + \frac{ 1}{ 3} - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...- \frac{1 }{2k+2 } - \frac{1 }{ k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } <br />
After subtracting out the two like terms on each side, the left hand side becomes the sum
\sum_{ k=(n+1)+1}^{ 2(n+1)} \frac{1 }{k }


and the terms \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2}- \frac{ 1}{ k+1} on the right simplify to \frac{ -1}{2(k+1) }, so the right side resembles the right side in (*). Therefore, the RHS becomes the sum \sum_{ m=1}^{2(n+1) } \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1} }{2m }

I'm wasn't sure if I was supposed to use the definition of part 1 in part 2 and I didn't, but I'm wondering if that would have made things easier. Thanks.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
marcin w said:
I'm working out a problem that requires me to proof a result by induction. I have worked out what I think is a correct proof, but I would like for somebody to look over it and give me feedback.
Part 1: Give a reasonable definition of the symbol \sum_{k = m}^{m + n}{a}_{k}
I first define:
<br /> \sum_{k = m}^{m}{a}_{k} = {a }_{ m}<br />
Then assuming I have defined \sum_{k = m}^{n}{a}_{k} for a fixed n >= m, I further defined:
\sum_{ k=m}^{n+1 } {a }_{k } =( \sum_{k=m }^{ n} { a}_{ k} )+ { a}_{n+1 }

Part 2 requires me to prove by induction that for all n >= 1, we have the assertion (call it A(n)):
\sum_{k=n+1 }^{ 2n} \frac{1 }{k } = \sum_{ m=1}^{ 2n} \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1 } }{m }

I approach this problem as I would have any proof by induction. The base case A(1) is true so I won't write it out here.
Your teacher might not appreciate that! Saying something is true is not proving that it is true.

Now, assuming the assertion is true for some k:
\frac{ 1}{ k+1} + \frac{1 }{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2k} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2k+1 } }{ 2k}

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to - \frac{ 1}{2k }.
I have to show that A(k+1) is true:
(*)\frac{ 1}{ k+2} + \frac{1 }{k+3 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{ 2(k+1)} = 1 - \frac{ 1}{2 } + \frac{1 }{3 } - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...+ \frac{ {(-1) }^{2(k+1)+1 } }{ 2(k+1)}

where the last term on the RHS simplifies to - \frac{1 }{ 2(k+1)}
Starting with A(k), I add \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2} - \frac{ 1}{ k+1} to each side and obtain:

\frac{ 1}{k+1 } + \frac{ 1}{k+2 } +...+ \frac{ 1}{2k } - \frac{1 }{k+1 } + \frac{1 }{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } =1- \frac{ 1}{ 2} + \frac{ 1}{ 3} - \frac{ 1}{ 4} +...- \frac{1 }{2k+2 } - \frac{1 }{ k+1} + \frac{ 1}{ 2k+1} + \frac{1 }{2k+2 } <br />
After subtracting out the two like terms on each side, the left hand side becomes the sum
\sum_{ k=(n+1)+1}^{ 2(n+1)} \frac{1 }{k }


and the terms \frac{ 1}{ 2k+2}- \frac{ 1}{ k+1} on the right simplify to \frac{ -1}{2(k+1) }, so the right side resembles the right side in (*). Therefore, the RHS becomes the sum \sum_{ m=1}^{2(n+1) } \frac{ {(-1) }^{m+1} }{2m }

I'm wasn't sure if I was supposed to use the definition of part 1 in part 2 and I didn't, but I'm wondering if that would have made things easier. Thanks.
In going form n to n+1, two things happen. First, since the sum starts at n+1 in the first case and (n+1)-1 in the second, you are missing the first term. Second, since the sum ends at 2n in the first case and 2(n+1)= 2n+ 2 in the second, you will have two new terms, 2n+1 and 2n+ 2. That is,
\sum_{k= (n+1)+1}^{2(n+1)} \frac{1}{k}= \sum_{k= n+1}^{2n} \frac{1}{k}+ \frac{1}{2n+1}+ \frac{1}{2n+2}- \frac{1}{n+1}
Now, replace that sum by
\sum_{m=1}^{2n} \frac{(-1)^m+1}{m}
and do the algebra.

You might want to use the fact that
\frac{1}{2n+2}- \frac{1}{n+1}= \frac{1- 2}{2n+2}= -\frac{1}{2n+2}
 
Thanks, your answer was helpful and much appreciated.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagoras'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top