Proof By Induction: Solving (2a+b) + ... + (2na + b) = n(an + a + b)

  • Thread starter Thread starter rooski
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the equation (2a+b) + (4a+b) + ... + (2na + b) = n(an + a + b) using mathematical induction for n ≥ 1. Participants clarify that the last term of the series is (2na + b), leading to specific sums for different values of n. For n=1, the sum simplifies to (2a+b), while for n=2 and n=3, it includes additional terms accordingly. There is an emphasis on ensuring that both sides of the equation are evaluated correctly when substituting n values. The conversation highlights the importance of understanding the series structure in the inductive proof process.
rooski
Messages
60
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



give an inductive proof for all n >= 1

(2a+b) + (4a+b) + ... + (2na + b) = n(an + a + b)


The Attempt at a Solution



In order to start the method of inductoin i have to prove that f(1) holds true.

I am confused by the ... in this equation though.

If n = 1, then would the equation be (2a+b)+(4a+b)+(2a+b) = n(an + a + b) ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
No, the last term of the series is (2na+b) which means that for n=1, it is (2a+b), for n=2 it is (4a+b), n=3 is (6a+b) etc. You are shown n=1, n=2 and n=n

Oh and you need to substitute n=1 into the right hand side too!
 
rooski said:

Homework Statement



give an inductive proof for all n >= 1

(2a+b) + (4a+b) + ... + (2na + b) = n(an + a + b)


The Attempt at a Solution



In order to start the method of inductoin i have to prove that f(1) holds true.

I am confused by the ... in this equation though.

If n = 1, then would the equation be (2a+b)+(4a+b)+(2a+b) = n(an + a + b) ?
The last term in the sum is "2na+ b".

For n= 1, 2n= 2 so we have only the first term: 2a+ b.
For n= 2, 2n= 4 so we have the first two terms: (2a+ b)+ (4a+ b)
For n= 3, 2n= 6 so we have the first three terms (2a+ b)+ (4a+ b)+ (6a+ b)
etc.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Essentially I just have this problem that I'm stuck on, on a sheet about complex numbers: Show that, for ##|r|<1,## $$1+r\cos(x)+r^2\cos(2x)+r^3\cos(3x)...=\frac{1-r\cos(x)}{1-2r\cos(x)+r^2}$$ My first thought was to express it as a geometric series, where the real part of the sum of the series would be the series you see above: $$1+re^{ix}+r^2e^{2ix}+r^3e^{3ix}...$$ The sum of this series is just: $$\frac{(re^{ix})^n-1}{re^{ix} - 1}$$ I'm having some trouble trying to figure out what to...
Back
Top