Proof equality of an equation with exponentials.

  • Thread starter Thread starter yungman
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the equality of an equation involving exponential functions with complex exponents. The original poster presents a scenario where constants A, B, and C are non-zero, and questions whether differentiating the equation once is sufficient to conclude that the exponents a, b, and c must be equal.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster attempts to differentiate the equation once and questions if this leads to a proof of a = b = c. Other participants challenge the reasoning and ask for clarification on the implications of the statements made.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants exploring different interpretations of the implications of the differentiation. Some guidance has been offered regarding the need for a direct proof to establish the truth of the implications presented.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted confusion regarding the introduction of a new variable 'd' in the reasoning, as well as the lack of clarity on the validity of the conditional statements made by the original poster.

yungman
Messages
5,741
Reaction score
291
Proof if A,B and C are non zero constant:
[tex]Ae^{jax}+Be^{jbx}=Ce^{jcx}\;\Rightarrow\; a=b=c[/tex]
The answer from the book involve differentiating it twice and manipulate a, b and c to proof.

My question is if I differentiate it once:
[tex]\Rightarrow\;jaAe^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx}=jcCe^{jcx}[/tex]
So if
[tex]Ae^{jax}+Be^{jbx}=Ce^{jcx}\;\hbox { and }\;jaAe^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx}=jcCe^{jcx}[/tex]
Does that already proof a=b=c?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
yungman said:
Proof if A,B and C are non zero constant:
[tex]Ae^{jax}+Be^{jbx}=Ce^{jcx}\;\Rightarrow\; a=b=c[/tex]
The answer from the book involve differentiating it twice and manipulate a, b and c to proof.

My question is if I differentiate it once:
[tex]\Rightarrow\;jaAe^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx}=jcCe^{jcx}[/tex]
So if
[tex]Ae^{jax}+Be^{jbx}=Ce^{jcx}\;\hbox { and }\;jaAe^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx}=jcCe^{jcx}[/tex]
Does that already proof a=b=c?

It's not a proof until you say why you think that proves a=b=c.
 
Dick said:
It's not a proof until you say why you think that proves a=b=c.

Can I say if
[tex]Ae^{jax}+Be^{jbx}=Ce^{jcx}\;\hbox { and }\;jd(Ae^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx})=jcCe^{jcx}\Rightarrow;d=c[/tex]
and if
[tex]\;jaAe^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx}=jd(Ae^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx})\Rightarrow\; a=b=d[/tex]

Therefore a=b=c

Thanks
Alan
 
yungman said:
Can I say if
[tex]Ae^{jax}+Be^{jbx}=Ce^{jcx}\;\hbox { and }\;jd(Ae^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx})=jcCe^{jcx}\Rightarrow;d=c[/tex]
and if
[tex]\;jaAe^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx}=jd(Ae^{jax}+jbBe^{jbx})\Rightarrow\; a=b=d[/tex]

Therefore a=b=c

Thanks
Alan

I really don't know where those implications are coming from and I don't see how you got a 'd' out of an expression containing a, b and c.
 
You have written some conditional statements in the form of [itex]P \Rightarrow Q[/itex], but you haven't included any proof of whether they're true or not.

By direct proof, for instance, you have to show that P being true forces Q to be true.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
6K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K