Proof: extremum has a semi definitie Hessian matrix

Coffee_
Messages
259
Reaction score
2
Consider a function ##f : U \subseteq \mathbb{R}^{n} -> \mathbb{R}## that is an element of ##C^{2}## which has an minimum in ##p \in U##.

According to Taylor's theorem for multiple variable functions, for each ##h \in U## there exists a ##t \in ]0,1[## such that :

##f(p+h)-f(p) = h^{T}.D^{2}(p+th).h##

Where ##D^{2}## is the Hessian or the matrix with the mixed partial derivatives, ##D^{2}(p+th)## means it's not in point p. I already assume it's a minimum so the Jacobian matrix that should be there is 0.

Now I should take a limit and somehow show that in both cases where p is a strict or not strict minimum that is ##f(p)<f(x)## of ##f(p)\leq f(x)## that in both cases ##D^{2}## will be negative semi definite. Can someone help me finish/understand this final step formally? Because I'm not sure about how a limit will work in the equation above, the left term just goes to zero.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You could divide both sides by ## ||h||^2 ##.
 
wabbit said:
You could divide both sides by ## ||h||^2 ##.

Not sure what that would give me. Left I'd get a similar expression to the derivative but since it's in multiple variables I'm not sure. It would be equal to the limit of ##\frac{D*h}{||h||}## I guess?
 
Well you can then have ##h\rightarrow 0## but ##h/||h||## remains finite, and you could set this to be any vector ##u=h/||h||## of your choice and see what this tells you about D when h approaches 0 but u is fixed.

Or if you prefer that formulation, set ##h=\theta u## and take the limit as ##\theta\rightarrow 0##

I don't know what your "*" is but if it is just usual matrix-vector multiplication, no this isn't what you get.
 
wabbit said:
Well you can then have ##h\rightarrow 0## but ##h/||h||## remains finite, and you could set this to be any vector ##u=h/||h||## of your choice and see what this tells you about D when h approaches 0 but u is fixed.

Or if you prefer that formulation, set ##h=\theta u## and take the limit as ##\theta\rightarrow 0##

I don't know what your "*" is but if it is just usual matrix-vector multiplication, no this isn't what you get.

I reasoned that that's what's it supposed to be according to ##lim \frac{f(p+h)-f(p)-D*h}{||h||}=0## where ##D## is the derivative matrix.
 
But as you stated in your op, the first derivative is 0 and D is the Hessian, so suddenly using D as the jacobian instead is truly bizarre reasonning.

Oh sorry I see you were using ##D^2## to denote the hessian - please read my previous statement as referring to that.
 
wabbit said:
But as you stated in your op, the first derivative is 0 and D is the Hessian, so suddenly using D as the jacobian instead is truly bizarre reasonning.

Oh right, should have thought a bit longer before replying.
 
Back
Top