Proof Involving Continuity, Irrational Numbers From Elementary Proof Class

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the existence of a unique real number, x, such that the integral of a non-zero continuous function f(s) from 0 to x equals π. Participants clarify that "non-zero" means the function cannot be identically zero, while "continuous" refers to the function's behavior over its domain. A proposed counterexample involves the function -[(s^2 + 1)^2], suggesting that it may not yield an integral equal to π for any real x. The conclusion emphasizes the need for a clear understanding of the definitions involved in the proof.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of integral calculus, specifically the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus.
  • Familiarity with the concepts of continuity and non-zero functions in mathematical analysis.
  • Knowledge of real analysis, particularly the properties of real numbers and functions.
  • Ability to construct and analyze proofs in a mathematical context.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the Fundamental Theorem of Calculus in detail to understand the relationship between differentiation and integration.
  • Explore the properties of continuous functions and their implications in real analysis.
  • Research examples of non-zero functions and their integrals to see how they behave over different intervals.
  • Learn about counterexamples in mathematical proofs to strengthen proof construction skills.
USEFUL FOR

Students in advanced calculus or real analysis courses, mathematics educators, and anyone interested in the properties of continuous functions and their integrals.

snackAtacck
Messages
1
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let f be a non-zero continuous function. Prove or disprove that there exists a unique, real number, x, such that the integral from 0 to x of f(s) w.r.t. s = pi.


Homework Equations


If any exist, please let me know.

The Attempt at a Solution



[PLAIN]http://img2.imageshack.us/img2/5021/bonusk.png

I've come to the conclusion that I set up the problem completely wrong, as I did not notice the existence qualifier was unique. Still, to disprove it comes down to showing that there do not exist any real numbers that satisfy the equation, or showing that there are more than one.

The thing is, I'm not entirely sure of what "non-zero" means. I thought it meant that the function cannot literally be a constant 0 for all inputs, but a classmate of mine has insisted that a function is only non-zero if none of its values are zero.

Anyway, I don't see why letting -[(s^2 +1)^2] be the value of the integral and then finding the corresponding functions for f(s) wouldn't work as an example of a function for which that integral will never be equal to pi. We'd have an example for which all x in R would fail to make the integral of f(s) = pi.

I think that I could figure this one out if I only knew what "non-zero" and "continuous" meant.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
A function is nonzero if it is not constant zero. So for example the function 2x is nonzero, although it has a value where it evaluates to zero.

As for your attempt of proof, I think you've got it correct.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
7K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K