Proof involving some inequality

  • Thread starter Thread starter Extropy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on the challenge of proving an inequality involving a sequence of functions defined by integrals of bounded continuous functions. It begins with three numbers whose absolute values are constrained, and the functions are expressed in terms of these numbers and their previous iterations. While the initial inequality is clear, the reasoning behind the subsequent inequality involving factorials is less intuitive. An example illustrates the worst-case scenario, demonstrating how the factorial arises in the differences between iterations. The goal is to generalize this understanding for arbitrary functions and initial values within the specified bounds.
Extropy
Messages
17
Reaction score
0
Difficulty with some inequality

Suppose that one has three numbers, v_j^0 for j=1, 2, and 3, and let their absolute values be less than or equal to 1. Suppose that one has nine continuous functions c_{jk} all of which are bounded, and thus all of which are bounded by an amount \tfrac{k}{3}.

Define

v_j^{(1)}(s)=v_j^0+\int_0^s \sum_{k=1}^3 c_{jk}(\sigma) v_k^0 d\sigma

and

v_j^{(n)}(s)=v_j^0+\int_0^s \sum_{k=1}^3 c_{jk}(\sigma) v_k^{(n-1)}(\sigma) d\sigma

It is perfectly understandable why

|v_j^{(1)}-v_j^0| \le ks,

but not so clear why

|v_j^{(n)}-v_j^{(n-1)}| \le \frac{k^n s^n}{n!}.

Somehow, one is supposed to be able to divide by n, but I do not see how is able to.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
If we set ##v_j^{(0)}=1## and ##c_{ji}=\dfrac{k}{3}## then we get ##v_j^{(1)}(s)=1+ks## and the one is the culprit for the denominator ##n!##. This is because in the second step we get ##v_j^{(2)}(s)=1+ks+\dfrac{k^2s^2}{2}## and the difference will be ##|v_j^{(2)}(s)-v_j^{(1)}(s)| =\dfrac{k^2s^2}{2}## and so on.

This example is somehow the worst case scenario, but it illustrates what happens. Now you have to generalize this for arbitrary ##c_{ji}(\sigma)## and ##v_j^{(0)}##, i.e. within the given constraints.
 
Suppose ,instead of the usual x,y coordinate system with an I basis vector along the x -axis and a corresponding j basis vector along the y-axis we instead have a different pair of basis vectors ,call them e and f along their respective axes. I have seen that this is an important subject in maths My question is what physical applications does such a model apply to? I am asking here because I have devoted quite a lot of time in the past to understanding convectors and the dual...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Back
Top