Proof of 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n -1) = n2

  • Thread starter Thread starter zeion
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Induction
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The proof of the statement 1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n - 1) = n² for all positive integers n is established through mathematical induction. The base case for n=1 is verified, and the inductive step shows that if the statement holds for k, it also holds for k+1. The progression of statements must be clear and strictly follow from one another to avoid assuming what is being proven. Careful wording and a structured approach are essential in presenting the proof accurately.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of mathematical induction
  • Familiarity with sequences and series
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of positive integers
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the principles of mathematical induction in depth
  • Explore proofs involving sequences and series
  • Learn about common pitfalls in mathematical proofs
  • Review examples of inductive proofs in various mathematical contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students in mathematics, educators teaching proof techniques, and anyone interested in understanding mathematical induction and series summation.

zeion
Messages
455
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



Show that the statement holds for all positive integers n.

1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2n -1) = n2


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Assume that k will work, then k + 1:

1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2(k+1) -1) = (k+1)2
1 + 3 + 5 + ... + 2k+1 = k2 + 2k + 1

Recall that for k,
1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2k -1) = k2

Then k+1,
1 + 3 + 5 + ... + (2k -1) + (2k+1) = k2 + (2k + 1)

Is this enough to conclude that the statement holds?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Yes, that is correct. I would just be a little careful in your wording and progression of statements. I know that you are working backwards so to speak, but from appearances, it looks like you are assuming what you are trying to prove. When doing induction, try to be as strict and algorithmic as possible. Make sure each statement follows directly from the one preceding it.
 
n!kofeyn said:
Yes, that is correct. I would just be a little careful in your wording and progression of statements. I know that you are working backwards so to speak, but from appearances, it looks like you are assuming what you are trying to prove. When doing induction, try to be as strict and algorithmic as possible. Make sure each statement follows directly from the one preceding it.

I guess you ought to mention the equation satisfy for n=1 .
This is important as 1 is the first pst integer.
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
3K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 49 ·
2
Replies
49
Views
6K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
4K
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
9
Views
4K