Proof of Conjugate Cycles Property of Permutations

  • Context: MHB 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Kiwi1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Conjugate Cycles
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the conjugate cycles property of permutations, specifically that for a cycle α = (a_1,...,a_s) and a permutation π in Sn, the expression παπ^−1 results in the cycle (π(a_1), ... , π(a_s)). The proof involves demonstrating that the length of the conjugated cycle divides s and validating the mapping of elements through π. Participants confirmed the proof's correctness and suggested alternative notations for clarity.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of permutation groups, specifically Sn.
  • Familiarity with cycle notation in permutations.
  • Knowledge of group theory concepts, including conjugation.
  • Basic proof techniques in abstract algebra.
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of permutation groups in detail.
  • Learn about conjugacy classes in group theory.
  • Explore advanced topics in abstract algebra, such as Sylow theorems.
  • Practice constructing rigorous proofs in group theory.
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of abstract algebra, and anyone interested in the properties of permutations and group theory will benefit from this discussion.

Kiwi1
Messages
106
Reaction score
0
Prove:

Let \alpha = (a_1,...,a_s) be a cycle and let \pi be a permutation in Sn. Then \pi \alpha \pi ^{-1} is the cycle (\pi(a_1), ... \pi(a_s))

My attempt.
(\pi \alpha \pi ^{-1})^s = (\pi \alpha^s \pi ^{-1})=e so if this thing is a cycle and its length divides s.

Assume \pi (a_1) is a member of the cycle. Then:

\pi \alpha \pi ^{-1}(\pi (a_1))=\pi (a_2)

and

\pi \alpha \pi ^{-1}(\pi (a_i))=\pi (a_{i+1}) for 1 \leq i < s

and finally

\pi (a_{s+1})=\pi \alpha \pi ^{-1}(\pi (a_s))=\pi(a_1) (validating the assumption)

I think I have all of the components of a proof here. But how can I make it more rigorous?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi,

You got it, but if you want to see another way of writing it, I would have do the following.

Let $s_{1},\ldots,s_{n}$ be all the elements on $\mathcal{S}_{n}$.

If $s_{i}\neq a_{j}$ for any $j$, then $\pi\alpha\pi^{-1}(s_{i})=s_{i}$.

If $s_{i}=a_{j}$ for some $j$, then $\pi\alpha\pi^{-1}(s_{i})=a_{j+1}$ (Here we denote $a_{1}=a_{s+1}$).

And that's all.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
5K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K