Proof of Cyclic Subgroup Equivalence for Finite Groups

iamalexalright
Messages
157
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose a \in <b>
Then <a> = <b> iff a and b have the same order (let the order be n - the group is assumed to be finite for the problem).


Proof:
Suppose a and b have the same order (going this direction I'm trying to show that <a> is contained in <b> and <b> is contained in <a> ergo <a> = <b>).

Since a \in &lt;b&gt; it is obvious that &lt;a&gt; \subseteq &lt;b&gt;.

Since a is in <b>, a = b^{m} for some m.
So &lt;a&gt; = &lt;b^{m}&gt; \supseteq &lt;b&gt;
Hence <a> = <b>

Suppose <a> = <b> and <b> has order n.
a = b^{m}'
a^{n} = (b^{m})^{n} = (b^{n})^{m} = e^{m} = e

Hence a has order n.

This all look good?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
For the first part, it doesn't look like you used the fact that a and b have the same order... That might be a problem. Also, it's not true that the subgroup generated by b is contained in the subgroup generated by b^m. It should go the other way.
 
Yeah, I see that now...
Well, its obvious that <a> is contained in <b>

Not sure how I can use the fact that a and b have the same order to prove the other direction, any hints?
 
You know that the order of any subgroup of a group must be a divisor of the order of the group.

Oh, that is confusing to read.

Let me try again. You know that some group has order n. You should also know that the order of any subgroup of that group is going to divide n.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top