The Galilean transformations are simple.(adsbygoogle = window.adsbygoogle || []).push({});

x'=x-vt

y'=y

z'=z

t'=t.

Then why is there so much jargon and complication involved in proving that Galilean transformations satisfy the four group properties (Closure, Associative, Identity, Inverse)? Why talk of 10 generators? Why talk of rotation as part of the proof?

Can anyone point to a simple formal proof that Galilean transformations form a group, without unnecessary jargon.

Once we have a simple proof that Galilean transformations form a group why can THAT not be extended to prove, in a simple way, that Lorentz transformations also form a group. Thanks.

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**

Dismiss Notice

Join Physics Forums Today!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

The friendliest, high quality science and math community on the planet! Everyone who loves science is here!

# I Proof that Galilean & Lorentz Ts form a group

Have something to add?

Draft saved
Draft deleted

Loading...

Similar Threads for Proof Galilean Lorentz | Date |
---|---|

A Algebraic Proofs of Levi-Civita Symbol Identities | Jul 3, 2017 |

A Usage of kinetic energy in proof for E=mc^2 | Jul 2, 2017 |

A General relativity -- Proof of energy measured by observer | Apr 13, 2017 |

I D'Alembert equation and Galilean transformation | Jan 30, 2017 |

**Physics Forums - The Fusion of Science and Community**