Proof that if 32 -|- ((a^2+3)(a^2+7)) if a is even

  • Thread starter Thread starter mhz
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    even Proof
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that 32 does not divide the expression ((a^2 + 3)(a^2 + 7)) when a is even. Participants clarify the difference between a statement's contrapositive and its converse, emphasizing that proving the contrapositive validates the original statement. The proof presented shows that if a is odd, then 32 divides the product, leading to the conclusion that if a is even, 32 cannot divide the expression. Misunderstandings arise from the phrasing of the problem, highlighting the importance of precise language in mathematical proofs. Overall, the conversation centers on correctly establishing the proof's logic and structure.
mhz
Messages
39
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Proof that if 32 -|- ((a^2+3)(a^2+7)) if a is even. (note: -|- means NOT divides)

The question asks for a proof of this statement.

Homework Equations



If a | b, then there exists an integer k such that b = ka.

The Attempt at a Solution



If the contrapositive of the statement is true, then so is the statement. So we will prove that if a is odd, then 32 | ((a^2+3)(a^2+7)).Since a is odd, (a^2+3)(a^2+7) is even, 2 | ((a^2+3)(a^2+7)). This must mean that there exists an integer k such that ((a^2+3)(a^2+7)) = 2k. ...
 
Physics news on Phys.org
32 can't divide the product of 2 odd numbers, right ?
 
Right, but I'm trying to prove that in a sort of fashion that I've already shown (long-winded and specifically showing each step, trying not to assume much).

What you're arguing is something like:

Suppose a is even. Then a^2 is even, so both a^2+3 and a^2+7 are odd. Since 32 is even, 32 \nmid ((a^2+3)(a^2+7)).

However that logic is flawed. This is saying that since the converse of the statement is true, so too must the statement be true. (but that is wrong)
 
You are in error. The proof you posted which you read from my statement is perfecty ok. There's no converse anywhere. The converse would have been something like:

Prove that if 32 doesn't divide (a^2 +3) (a^2 +7) then a is even.

As you can see the converse in not involved in the proof you posted.
 
Prove that 32 divides (a^2 +3) (a^2 +7) if a is odd.

That is the contrapositive, not the converse.

Converse of "if A then B" is "if B then A", the contrapositive is "if not B then not A".

Since A in this case is "if 32 doesn't divide (a^2 +3) (a^2 +7)" and B is "a is even". The converse would be "if a is even then 32 doesn't divide (a^2 +3) (a^2 +7)" and the proof I posted in my second post proves that. However, my point is that the proof of the converse does not always prove the statement.

What I'm trying to do is one of the following:
a) Prove the statement: "if 32 doesn't divide (a^2 +3) (a^2 +7) then a is even"
b) Prove the contrapositive: "if a is odd, 32 divides (a^2 +3) (a^2 +7)"

A little while after my last post I came up with this, and I think this proof is ok:

If the contrapositive of the statement is true, then so is the statement. So we will prove that if a is odd, then 32 | ((a^2+3)(a^2+7)).

Since a is odd, a^2 must be odd so both a^2 +3 and a^2 +7 must be even, but also since a^2 ≥ 1, ((a^2+3)(a^2+7)) ≥ 4*8 ≥ 32.
Therefore 32 | ((a^2 +3)(a^2 + 7)).
 
mhz said:
Proof that if 32 -|- ((a^2+3)(a^2+7)) if a is even. (note: -|- means NOT divides)
I think the confusion is stemming from the fact that you have two "ifs" in your problem statement. One of them should not be there, and the meaning will be different depending on which one you keep.
 
I picked up this problem from the Schaum's series book titled "College Mathematics" by Ayres/Schmidt. It is a solved problem in the book. But what surprised me was that the solution to this problem was given in one line without any explanation. I could, therefore, not understand how the given one-line solution was reached. The one-line solution in the book says: The equation is ##x \cos{\omega} +y \sin{\omega} - 5 = 0##, ##\omega## being the parameter. From my side, the only thing I could...
Back
Top