Proof that int_(-1)^1 1/x = 0

  • Thread starter Thread starter irycio
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the non-existence of the improper integral \(\int_{-1}^1 \frac{1}{x} dx\). Participants clarify that this integral can be expressed as the sum of two divergent integrals, \(\int_{-1}^0 \frac{dx}{x}\) and \(\int_0^1 \frac{dx}{x}\), both tending towards infinity. They distinguish between this improper integral and the Cauchy Principal Value, which evaluates to 0. The conclusion emphasizes that while the Cauchy Principal Value exists, the original integral does not due to the undefined nature of the one-sided limits.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of improper integrals
  • Familiarity with the concept of limits in calculus
  • Knowledge of logarithmic functions and their properties
  • Concept of Cauchy Principal Value in integration
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of improper integrals in calculus
  • Learn about the Cauchy Principal Value and its applications
  • Explore the behavior of logarithmic functions near their discontinuities
  • Investigate the concept of limits and their significance in calculus
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, calculus instructors, and anyone interested in advanced integration techniques and the nuances of improper integrals.

irycio
Messages
96
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement



I'd like to prove the inexistence of \int_{-1}^1 \frac{1}{x} dx, or at least that it's not 0.

Homework Equations



Well... :P

The Attempt at a Solution



Since integrating is linear, we can write \int_{-1}^1 \frac{1}{x} dx = \int_{-1}^0 \frac{dx}{x} + \int_0^1 \frac{dx}{x}. Since first integral is -\infty and the 2nd is \infty, their sum is not known.But I don't like this prove. Anyone can come up with a better one?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Especially since you did not prove that each of those two integrals is infinite!
Nor is "infinity- infinity" (in the limit sense) non-existent. Simply saying it "is not known" does not mean it does not exist.

The basic definition of such an improper integral is
\displaytype\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\int_{-1}^{-\epsilon}\frac{1}{x}dx+ \lim_{\delta\to 0}\int_{\delta}^1\frac{1}{x}dx

You can take the anti-derivative of 1/x, put it into each of those and see what happens to the limits.

(This is NOT the same as the "Cauchy Principle value",
\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\left(\int_{-1}^{-\epsilon} \frac{1}{x}dx+ \int_\epsilon^1 \frac{1}{x}dx\right)
which is, in fact, 0.)
 
Well, since anti-derivative of \frac{1}{x} is Log|x|, we eventually get lim_{\epsilon -> 0} Log|-\epsilon| - lim_{\delta -> 0} Log|delta|, which again is \infty - \infty. Basically, I can't see much difference between those 2 limits you wrote (one with epsilon and delta and one for Cauchy's principle value).E:Oh, I see now. The latter one, for Cauchy, is 0 as it is a limit of a difference of, say, a-a, whereas the first one is a difference of left-side limit and right-side limit. Or not?
 
Last edited:
irycio said:
Well, since anti-derivative of \frac{1}{x} is Log|x|, we eventually get lim_{\epsilon -> 0} Log|-\epsilon| - lim_{\delta -> 0} Log|\delta|, which again is \infty - \infty. Basically, I can't see much difference between those 2 limits you wrote (one with epsilon and delta and one for Cauchy's principle value).


E:Oh, I see now. The latter one, for Cauchy, is 0 as it is a limit of a difference of, say, a-a, whereas the first one is a difference of left-side limit and right-side limit. Or not?
Yes, that is true. For the Cauchy principal value, you have
\lim_{\epsilon\to 0}\left( ln|\epsilon|- ln|\epsilon|\right)= \lim_{\epsilon\to 0} 0= 0

But for the pther, since the two one-sided limits do not exist, their difference does not exist. (Which is NOT the same as saying "infinity - infinity does not exist".
 
Whoa, whoa, whoa, wait ;). The left-sided limit definitely doesn't exist, since in Reals there is no logarithm of negative number. But why would the right-sided limit not exist? I mean, infinity is a kind of a limit, isn't it?
 

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
4K