Proove A Limit Using Delta and Epsilon

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a limit as x approaches 4 for the function f(x) = x^2 - 8x, specifically showing that it equals -16. The subject area is calculus, focusing on the epsilon-delta definition of limits.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the manipulation of the expression x^2 - 8x + 16 and its factorization into (x - 4)(x - 4). There are attempts to establish bounds for |x - 4| to satisfy the limit definition, with some questioning the role of constants like C in their reasoning. Others express confusion about the correct approach to isolating |x - 4| from the inequality |x - 4|^2 < e.

Discussion Status

Some participants have provided insights that helped clarify the problem, such as recognizing the need to take the square root of both sides of the inequality. There is an acknowledgment of confusion regarding the correct interpretation of the limit definition and the role of constants in the process.

Contextual Notes

There was an initial misunderstanding regarding the equation setup, with corrections made to the original problem statement. Participants are navigating through various interpretations and clarifications of the limit definition and its application.

TrueStar
Messages
94
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Proove the limit as x approaches 4 for f(x)=x^2-8x= -16

Homework Equations



Definition of Precise Limits

The Attempt at a Solution



I know that I want x^2-8x+16 (after moving the -16 over per the limit definition) to look like |x-4|

Factoring gets me (x-4)(x-4)<e

Because I have two factors, I want to bound one of them so that -1<|x-4|<1.

Adding the four to both sides, I get 3<x<5, but when I add four back in (since both factors are the same), I'm back to -1<|x-4|<1. This leads me to believe that C=1, but I don't think I'm doing this part right. I know the answer isn't 'e'.

I'm lost at this point.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Ok, you have x2-8x+16=(x-4)2.

Now the objective is: Given e>0, what must |x-4| be smaller than to make |x-4|2<e? You can usually do this backwards, that is start with |x-4|2<e and see if you can find an inequality for |x-4| from this
 
That's what I thought I was doing, but I know I'm not getting the correct answer. I think I'm looking for an E/C, but when C=1, it's the same as E.
 
I'm confused by what C is supposed to be.

If you have |x-4|2<e, what operation should you do to "solve" for |x-4|?
 
From what I understand, if you have two factors, but only one matches the inequality for the limit (in this case -1<|x-4<1 )...I need to find a positive constant C such that the absolute value of the other factor is <C.

This is a bit confusing since the original equation factors out to (x-4)(x-4). They are the same.

To do this, I bound the factor I want which can be -1<|x-4|<1. Adding the x to both sides makes it 3<x<5. To get C, I take the other factor and apply it to this new inequality. The other factor is also x-4 so I subtract 4 from the x in 3<x<5 which takes me right back to -1<x-4<1. This means that C equals 1 and the two restrictions on the factor I need is |x-4|<1 and |x-4|<e/C. That is e/1 which is only e.

This is wrong.

Sorry for the confusion, I'm still trying to get a clear understanding of the subject myself.
 
Guh...I figured it out after I walked away from the problem for awhile. (x-4)(x-4) is (x-4)^2. That means I only had to take the square root of both sides and the answer is sqrt of e.

No wonder you were asking me about C...it wasn't even needed for this.

Thank you for showing me the problem in a different way. :) It helped me figure it out.
 
"Moving the 16 over", in f(x)= x^2- 8x= 16 gives x^2- 8x- 16, not x^2- 8x+ 16.
 
That is my fault; the original problem has -16, not 16. I fixed my original post. Thank you for pointing that out.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 31 ·
2
Replies
31
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 20 ·
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
5K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K