Propagating Wave: Explaining Oscillation & Sine Wave

  • Thread starter Thread starter Cerkit
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Wave
AI Thread Summary
In electromagnetic (EM) waves, the oscillation represents the changing electric and magnetic fields that propagate through space. This oscillation means that a positive test charge in the field experiences a varying force due to these changing fields. The source of the wave, typically oscillating dipoles, generates the EM wave at the same frequency as their oscillation. Understanding this relationship is crucial for grasping how energy is transferred through the wave. The discussion emphasizes the connection between the source's oscillation and the resulting characteristics of the EM wave.
Cerkit
Messages
15
Reaction score
0
Hi. Can someone explain for a propagating wave (ie an EM wave) when it is represented as oscillating and portrayed as a sine wave. What does the oscillation physically mean? Energy is being transferred as the wave propagates but what does the oscillation actually mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Cerkit said:
what does the oscillation actually mean?
It means that a small positive test charge placed anywhere the field is oscillating would experience an oscillating force.
 
Ok. So what is it about the source of the wave that causes the oscillation?
 
I don't know what kind of an answer you are looking for here.
 
Cerkit said:
Ok. So what is it about the source of the wave that causes the oscillation?

Oscillating dipoles create EM-waves with the same frequency as the oscillation itself.
 
Thread 'Gauss' law seems to imply instantaneous electric field propagation'
Imagine a charged sphere at the origin connected through an open switch to a vertical grounded wire. We wish to find an expression for the horizontal component of the electric field at a distance ##\mathbf{r}## from the sphere as it discharges. By using the Lorenz gauge condition: $$\nabla \cdot \mathbf{A} + \frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial \phi}{\partial t}=0\tag{1}$$ we find the following retarded solutions to the Maxwell equations If we assume that...
Maxwell’s equations imply the following wave equation for the electric field $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}}{\partial t^2} = \frac{1}{\varepsilon_0}\nabla\rho+\mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf J}{\partial t}.\tag{1}$$ I wonder if eqn.##(1)## can be split into the following transverse part $$\nabla^2\mathbf{E}_T-\frac{1}{c^2}\frac{\partial^2\mathbf{E}_T}{\partial t^2} = \mu_0\frac{\partial\mathbf{J}_T}{\partial t}\tag{2}$$ and longitudinal part...
Thread 'Recovering Hamilton's Equations from Poisson brackets'
The issue : Let me start by copying and pasting the relevant passage from the text, thanks to modern day methods of computing. The trouble is, in equation (4.79), it completely ignores the partial derivative of ##q_i## with respect to time, i.e. it puts ##\partial q_i/\partial t=0##. But ##q_i## is a dynamical variable of ##t##, or ##q_i(t)##. In the derivation of Hamilton's equations from the Hamiltonian, viz. ##H = p_i \dot q_i-L##, nowhere did we assume that ##\partial q_i/\partial...
Back
Top