Prospect for Nuclear Power Industry in US

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion centers on the future of the nuclear power industry in the United States, particularly in light of recent political support and the challenges associated with nuclear plant construction and operation. Participants explore various aspects including regulatory processes, public perception, and the implications of presidential support for nuclear energy.

Discussion Character

  • Debate/contested
  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • Some participants express skepticism about the president's ability to significantly influence nuclear power expansion, suggesting that congressional action is necessary for meaningful change.
  • Concerns are raised regarding the management of nuclear waste, with references to the Yucca Mountain project and its extensive studies as a potential solution.
  • Participants discuss the complexities of the nuclear licensing process, comparing it to a hypothetical single-step versus two-step home construction permitting process, highlighting the uncertainties that deter investment.
  • Some argue that public fear and opposition to nuclear power, influenced by cultural perceptions, pose significant barriers to the establishment of new plants.
  • There is mention of the current state of companies like Commonwealth Edison and Exelon, which operate multiple reactors but are hesitant to invest in new plants without government support and risk mitigation.
  • A later reply questions the operational history of the Shoreham Nuclear Plant, clarifying that it underwent testing but never generated electricity, which adds to the discussion on past failures impacting current perceptions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants generally do not reach a consensus on the future of nuclear power in the U.S. Multiple competing views remain regarding the feasibility of new plant construction, the effectiveness of presidential support, and the public's acceptance of nuclear energy.

Contextual Notes

Limitations include the dependence on political actions and public sentiment, as well as unresolved issues surrounding nuclear waste management and regulatory processes that may affect future developments in the nuclear power sector.

  • #91
Details of U.S.-India Nuclear Pact Unveiled
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=12309269

All Things Considered, July 27, 2007 · Without providing many technical details, Washington and New Delhi released a joint statement Friday saying they've completed negotiations on a deal that would open the doors for U.S. and Indian firms to participate in each other's civilian nuclear energy sector — a deal, first announced in 2005, that the Bush administration says is historic.

Under Secretary of State Nicholas Burns says negotiators have worked for two years and two days to reach this point — and he believes the deal complies with U.S. law.

"We believe this great historic civil nuclear agreement will become part of a new strategic partnership between our countries," Burns says. "We are ready to build that relationship with India."

The deal has many critics on Capitol Hill and among non-proliferation experts. Gary Milhollin of the Wisconsin Project on Nuclear Arms Control says the deal sends the wrong message to Iran.

"We tried to stop India from getting the bomb; we failed. India has the bomb; India is still building its missile program, and yet we are ready to treat India as a normal trading partner, basically because we want to make money," Milhollin says.

India never signed the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, and the Bush administration argues that this deal will bring India into the fold — putting its civilian nuclear facilities under inspection for the first time. Burns says Iran, on the other hand, is an outlaw state that should get a different message from the India deal.

. . . .

This should kick things up a notch.


Interestingly, the US domestic nuclear industry is largely foreign controlled. Westinghouse (including ABB-CE) was sold by the British BNFL to the Japanese Toshiba, and the French control AREVA (formerly B&W's and Exxon's/Siemens's nuclear divisions). GE's nuclear fuel group, GNF, is still US owned, but they are partnered with Hitachi and Toshiba, although with Toshiba's purchase of W, they will most likely withdraw from the partnership with GNF/Hitachi.
 
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #92
The Indians have a longterm thorium plan they've been pursuing, and so this new overture by the US seems intended to forestall that plan by offering up the more established and controlled technologies to India.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 41 ·
2
Replies
41
Views
5K
  • · Replies 29 ·
Replies
29
Views
5K
Replies
45
Views
7K
  • · Replies 52 ·
2
Replies
52
Views
10K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 44 ·
2
Replies
44
Views
8K