Protect SINE OUT BNC from SR830 lockin

  • Thread starter Thread starter Acosta
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sine
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on protecting the SR830 lock amplifier while applying a signal to a ceramic sample that may be sensitive to voltage. A 10Mohm resistor is suggested to limit electrical current and prevent damage, but concerns about its impact on results are raised. The importance of knowing the sample's voltage tolerance, frequency of the applied signal, and capacitance is emphasized for optimal protection. Recommendations include using a separate function generator for biasing the sample and monitoring the output with an oscilloscope to ensure accurate performance. Proper precautions are crucial to avoid potential damage to the SR830 and the sample during experiments.
Acosta
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,


I am trying to use SR830 lock amplifier at scientific experintal.

I need to apply the signal from SINE OUT BNC output in a thin ceramic sample.

My sample is an plane disk with electrodes in opposite faces.

This sample is isolante material, but sometimes the voltage can damage the sample and cause a short circuit between the electrodes and also a short circuit between pin signal e GND from SINE OUT BNC. I need 5Vrms from Lockin.

My question:
1) How can I protect SR830 not modify or affect my overall result?
2) Can I put an resitor 10Mohm in serie with my sample for to limite electrical current? For exemplo:
[signal from pin BNC]-----{resistor 10M}-----{sample}-----[GND from BNC]

3)This circuit would change my results if the sample remain undamaged?

Thanks a lot,
Acosta.
 
Engineering news on Phys.org
Welcome to the forum.

Some more specific information would be useful.
What is the voltage that will damage the sample?
What is the frequency of the signal applied to the sample?
What is the capacitance of your disk sample?

A 10Mohm resistor with the sample capacitance will form a frequency dependent low pass filter.
You could select a lower value resistor appropriate to the sample capacitance and frequency.
 
MODEL SR830 Manual said:
Sine Out amplitude maximum is 5.0 Vrms.
Sine Out has an output impedance of 50 ohm.
This limits output current peak to 142 mA.
A short circuit cannot damage the Sine Out terminal, because it has an internal 50 ohm limiting resistance.

High voltage applied accidentally to the Sine Out BNC terminal could damage the Sine Out amplifier.
If high voltages might be applied, then it should be protected by a voltage clamp such as a zener diode in a rectifier bridge. The best protection circuit in your case will depend on details not yet provided.
 
Hi Baluncore,
Thanks for your reply.

I´m sorry my delay.

1) What is the voltage that will damage the sample?
R: I do not know exactly, because the samples are new. Some can endure 5Vrms, but others do not.

2) What is the frequency of the signal applied to the sample?
R: I will use 5kHz - 60kHz. But may be i need 100kHz too.

3) What is the capacitance of your disk sample?
R: I do not know. This information is unknown to me, because I don´t have equipment to measure the capacitance.

4) A 10Mohm resistor with the sample capacitance will form a frequency dependent low pass filter. You could select a lower value resistor appropriate to the sample capacitance and frequency.
R: Thanks for reminding me. No I was not considering it. I will use now.

5) This limits output current peak to 142 mA. A short circuit cannot damage the Sine Out terminal, because it has an internal 50 ohm limiting resistance.
R: I did several tests using oscilloscope and changed the resistance to 10k.


Thank you very much by your help.
Helped very much.
Acosta.
 
I would avoid using the REF OUT output from the SR830 if possible. Ideally you should use a separate function generator to bias the sample and then connect its SYNC OUT to the REF IN on the SR830.
While you can use the SR830 as you describe, it is not really meant to be used that way and I would be careful if I were you, not so much because you will damage it but because I would not quite trust it it. I would at the very least hook an oscilloscope to monitor the signal to make sure the S830 is actually doing what it claims

(for the record, I like the SR830 and have used that model for many years; all of the above applies to all lock-ins, not just ones from Stanford Research)
 
Hi f95toli,
Thanks for your reply.

Good idea.
I will try to do this in my experiments and I can compare the results with my mount without 10k.

Thanks,
Acosta.
 
Hi all I have some confusion about piezoelectrical sensors combination. If i have three acoustic piezoelectrical sensors (with same receive sensitivity in dB ref V/1uPa) placed at specific distance, these sensors receive acoustic signal from a sound source placed at far field distance (Plane Wave) and from broadside. I receive output of these sensors through individual preamplifiers, add them through hardware like summer circuit adder or in software after digitization and in this way got an...
I have recently moved into a new (rather ancient) house and had a few trips of my Residual Current breaker. I dug out my old Socket tester which tell me the three pins are correct. But then the Red warning light tells me my socket(s) fail the loop test. I never had this before but my last house had an overhead supply with no Earth from the company. The tester said "get this checked" and the man said the (high but not ridiculous) earth resistance was acceptable. I stuck a new copper earth...
Thread 'Beauty of old electrical and measuring things, etc.'
Even as a kid, I saw beauty in old devices. That made me want to understand how they worked. I had lots of old things that I keep and now reviving. Old things need to work to see the beauty. Here's what I've done so far. Two views of the gadgets shelves and my small work space: Here's a close up look at the meters, gauges and other measuring things: This is what I think of as surface-mount electrical components and wiring. The components are very old and shows how...
Back
Top