Proton Acceleration: Newton's Law & Coulomb's Law

  • Thread starter Thread starter skepticwulf
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Acceleration
AI Thread Summary
The force between two protons in a nucleus, calculated using Coulomb's law, is approximately 14.4 N, indicating the strength of the nuclear force needed to overcome this. When applying Newton's law, the resulting acceleration appears to exceed the speed of light, raising questions about its compatibility with special relativity. However, this discrepancy arises because Newton's law is not suitable for relativistic speeds; momentum must be considered in the context of relativity. Using conservation of energy provides a more accurate method, showing that the final speed of protons, after converting potential energy to kinetic energy, is only about 2% of the speed of light. Thus, while initial calculations may suggest otherwise, relativistic effects ensure compliance with the speed of light limit.
skepticwulf
Messages
74
Reaction score
1
Using the Coulomb's law, the force between two protons inside a nucleus is about 14.4 N
Isn't that a colossal force for such a tiny particle?. I guess that shows how strong nuclear force must be to overcome this.

When I divide this however to the mass of proton, the acceleration due to Newton's law comes up as

=8.6 x 10^27 m/sec^2

That's far far beyond the speed of light for 1 second of acceleration, even for a fraction of second.

Doesn't that contradict with the special reality that says nothing goes beyond the speed of light??
 
Physics news on Phys.org
skepticwulf said:
Newton's law comes up as

=8.6 x 10^27 m/sec^2

That's far far beyond the speed of light for 1 second of acceleration, even for a fraction of second.

Doesn't that contradict with the special reality that says nothing goes beyond the speed of light??

No. Newton's law is ##F=\frac{dp}{dt}## where ##p## is the momentum. (The ##F=ma## that you're probably thinking of is for the special case of constant mass and speeds that are small compared with the speed of light). Use this, and remember that in relativity the momentum is defined as ##\frac{mv}{\sqrt{1-v^2}}##, and you won't get that faster than light speed.

Of course none of this is specific to the case of the nearby protons. Let any force, no matter how weak, act on a body for long enough and it will accelerate to speeds that require relativistic instead of classical treatments.
 
I think you have lost many powers of ten in your calculation.
 
skepticwulf said:
That's far far beyond the speed of light for 1 second of acceleration, even for a fraction of second.

If you make the time small enough, you can make the final speed as small as you want, no matter how large the acceleration is. But as Nugatory noted, you really need to do the calculation using relativistic equations. Also, calculating the final speed using F=ma or its relativistic equivalent is complicated because a isn't constant. You have to use calculus.

It's easier if you use conservation of energy. Find the Coulomb potential energy of two protons at whatever distance they exert a force of 14.4 N on each other. Assuming no other forces, and letting them fly apart, when they are far enough apart the potential energy will have (practically) all be converted to kinetic energy, divided equally between the two protons. Calculate the speed from the kinetic energy.

[added: I was surprised to find that the final speed is only about 2% of the speed of light, so if you use conservation of energy, you can safely use the classical formula for kinetic energy. Try it and see!]
 
Last edited:
Hello everyone, Consider the problem in which a car is told to travel at 30 km/h for L kilometers and then at 60 km/h for another L kilometers. Next, you are asked to determine the average speed. My question is: although we know that the average speed in this case is the harmonic mean of the two speeds, is it also possible to state that the average speed over this 2L-kilometer stretch can be obtained as a weighted average of the two speeds? Best regards, DaTario
The rope is tied into the person (the load of 200 pounds) and the rope goes up from the person to a fixed pulley and back down to his hands. He hauls the rope to suspend himself in the air. What is the mechanical advantage of the system? The person will indeed only have to lift half of his body weight (roughly 100 pounds) because he now lessened the load by that same amount. This APPEARS to be a 2:1 because he can hold himself with half the force, but my question is: is that mechanical...
Some physics textbook writer told me that Newton's first law applies only on bodies that feel no interactions at all. He said that if a body is on rest or moves in constant velocity, there is no external force acting on it. But I have heard another form of the law that says the net force acting on a body must be zero. This means there is interactions involved after all. So which one is correct?
Back
Top