Protons and neutrons the same mass?

Sarask
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
I was wondering, how can both a proton and a neutron weight 1u?

An Up quark has a mass of 1.7–3.1 MeV (according to Wikipedia).
Down has a mass of 4.1-5.7 MeV.
Average Up: 2.4
Average Down: 4.9

If a proton is Up+Up+Down (2.4+2.4+4.9) it has a mass of 9.7 MeV.
A neutron is Down+Down+Up (4.9+4.9+2.4), and it has a mass of 12.2 MeV.

How can protons and neutrons have the same mass?

Sorry if it's kind of confusing. :redface:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Sarask said:
I was wondering, how can both a proton and a neutron weight 1u?
They do not. This is just an approximation.

Proton: 1.007276 u = 938.3 MeV
Neutron: 1.008665 u = 939.6 MeV

Most of their mass comes from binding energy in QCD, but the small mass difference in the quarks can be seen in the total mass.
 
Sarask said:
I was wondering, how can both a proton and a neutron weight 1u?

An Up quark has a mass of 1.7–3.1 MeV (according to Wikipedia).
Down has a mass of 4.1-5.7 MeV.
Average Up: 2.4
Average Down: 4.9

If a proton is Up+Up+Down (2.4+2.4+4.9) it has a mass of 9.7 MeV.
A neutron is Down+Down+Up (4.9+4.9+2.4), and it has a mass of 12.2 MeV.
For starters, protons and neutrons don't consist of three quarks. They consist of a boatload of quarks, anti-quarks, and various bosons holding that mess together.

There are three valence quarks in each nucleon. What that means is that if for every quark in the nucleon you find an anti-quark, you'll end up with three quarks left without a pair. They will be uud for a proton and udd for a neutron. They are entirely responsible for nucleon's charge for example, as well as some other quantum numbers, but they make up a very small fraction of the nucleon's mass.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. Towards the end of the first lecture for the Qiskit Global Summer School 2025, Foundations of Quantum Mechanics, Olivia Lanes (Global Lead, Content and Education IBM) stated... Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/quantum-entanglement-is-a-kinematic-fact-not-a-dynamical-effect/ by @RUTA
If we release an electron around a positively charged sphere, the initial state of electron is a linear combination of Hydrogen-like states. According to quantum mechanics, evolution of time would not change this initial state because the potential is time independent. However, classically we expect the electron to collide with the sphere. So, it seems that the quantum and classics predict different behaviours!
Back
Top