Prove AM-GM Inequality: a,b,c ≥ 0 and a+b+c=3

  • Thread starter Thread starter klajv
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Inequality
AI Thread Summary
The discussion revolves around proving the AM-GM inequality for non-negative variables a, b, and c, given that their sum equals 3. Participants suggest rewriting the left-hand side of the inequality using the square of the sum of a, b, and c. This leads to the conclusion that ab + ac + bc must be less than or equal to 3. The conversation emphasizes the importance of manipulating the expressions to establish the inequality. Ultimately, the participants express gratitude for the assistance provided in solving the problem.
klajv
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Can't figure this out and hope to get some help, TIA!

a,b,c >= 0 and a+b+c=3
Prove that a²+b²+c²+ab+bc+ca >= 6
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Write the left hand side of the inequality differently, using the expression for (a+b+c)^2.

You will arrive upon the inequality ab+bc+ac <= 3 = a+b+c. Now, can you prove ab+bc+ac <= (a+b+c)(a+b+c)/3 ?
 
disregardthat <---

Yes, thanks alot
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...

Similar threads

Back
Top