MHB Prove an identity with binomial coefficients

lfdahl
Gold Member
MHB
Messages
747
Reaction score
0
Prove, that

$\sum_{j=1}^{2n-1}\frac{(-1)^{j-1}j}{{2n \choose j }} = \frac{n}{n+1}$

i have tried with proof by induction, but it is very difficult to use this technique.

I should be very glad to see any approach, that can crack this nut.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
lfdahl said:
Prove, that

$\sum_{j=1}^{2n-1}\frac{(-1)^{j-1}j}{{2n \choose j }} = \frac{n}{n+1}$

i have tried with proof by induction, but it is very difficult to use this technique.

I should be very glad to see any approach, that can crack this nut.
This looks like a difficult problem. The only help I could find online is a paper Alternating sums of the reciprocals of binomial coefficients. You might find that helpful if you can wade your way through the dense notation.

It is fascinating to see how the formula $\sum_{j=1}^{2n-1}\frac{(-1)^{j-1}j}{{2n \choose j }} = \frac{n}{n+1}$ works for small values of $n$. For example, when $n=4$ the left side is $\frac18 - \frac2{28} + \frac3{56} - \frac4{70} + \frac5{56} - \frac6{28} + \frac78$, which magically simplifies to $\frac45.$ Notice that if you pair together the terms from each end of the sum that have the same denominator, their sum has the constant numerator $2n$ (except that the middle term stands on its own, and its numerator is $n$). But that does not seem to make the problem any simpler.
 
sorry about my post, absolute nonsense mate
 
Fermat said:
sorry about my post, absolute nonsense mate
No problem at all! ;)

- - - Updated - - -

Opalg said:
This looks like a difficult problem. The only help I could find online is a paper Alternating sums of the reciprocals of binomial coefficients. You might find that helpful if you can wade your way through the dense notation.

It is fascinating to see how the formula $\sum_{j=1}^{2n-1}\frac{(-1)^{j-1}j}{{2n \choose j }} = \frac{n}{n+1}$ works for small values of $n$. For example, when $n=4$ the left side is $\frac18 - \frac2{28} + \frac3{56} - \frac4{70} + \frac5{56} - \frac6{28} + \frac78$, which magically simplifies to $\frac45.$ Notice that if you pair together the terms from each end of the sum that have the same denominator, their sum has the constant numerator $2n$ (except that the middle term stands on its own, and its numerator is $n$). But that does not seem to make the problem any simpler.

Thanks a lot, Opalg, for your thorough considerations and numerical observations. I did observe my self, that pairing the terms from each end of the sum results in a common denominator ($2n$), but I was not able to proceed and get any closer to a final result ...:(
Well, anyway, from your considerations its a "comfort" to know, that the problem in fact is difficult, and that I didn´t overlook any obvious approach. Thankyou once again!
 
Hi all, I've been a roulette player for more than 10 years (although I took time off here and there) and it's only now that I'm trying to understand the physics of the game. Basically my strategy in roulette is to divide the wheel roughly into two halves (let's call them A and B). My theory is that in roulette there will invariably be variance. In other words, if A comes up 5 times in a row, B will be due to come up soon. However I have been proven wrong many times, and I have seen some...
Thread 'Detail of Diagonalization Lemma'
The following is more or less taken from page 6 of C. Smorynski's "Self-Reference and Modal Logic". (Springer, 1985) (I couldn't get raised brackets to indicate codification (Gödel numbering), so I use a box. The overline is assigning a name. The detail I would like clarification on is in the second step in the last line, where we have an m-overlined, and we substitute the expression for m. Are we saying that the name of a coded term is the same as the coded term? Thanks in advance.
Back
Top