Prove Colinearity of Set of n Points

  • Thread starter Thread starter didi
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Points
AI Thread Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that a set of n distinct points in a plane, where any two points have a third point that is collinear with them, must all be collinear. Participants suggest using induction to establish the proof, starting with the base case of n=3 and then considering the induction step for n=k points. A contradiction approach is also proposed, where it is assumed that the points are not collinear, leading to a minimum non-zero distance between points and lines that results in a contradiction. The conversation highlights the complexity of the inductive step and the need for clarity in the proof structure. Overall, the participants seek to clarify the proof methods and share insights on the topic.
didi
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hi,
Can you tell me how to prove the following?

Given a set of n distinct points in the plane such that for any two points in the set there is a third point in the set that is colinear with them (i.e., lies on the same line with them), prove that all the n in the set are colinear (i.e., lie on the same line).
Thank you
didi
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
It seems you can use induction here:
1) Prove that the proposition holds for n=3
2) Try to do the induction step on your own
 
arildno said:
2) Try to do the induction step on your own

Suppose the induction hypothesis is that the theorem holds for n = k-1 points, and you want to show that implies it holds for n = k points. In a set of k points, how do you know that there is a subset of k-1 points that satisfies the condition in the statement of the problem? What if that k-th point is the one that holds everything together?
 
I've been thinking about this problem and I don't see how you do it with induction. arildno can you explain how the inductive step works because I can't seem to think my way through it.

The proof that I can think goes like this
Say for contradiction you have a point set P that satisfies above but is not a line. Take L to be the set of lines that contain 2 or more points from P (in fact they all contain 3 points). Note that both L and P are finite. Also you can measure distance between a point and a line as the perpendicular distance.

So there are a also a finite amount of distances between points and lines and at least one distance is greater than zero (for every line you have at least one point such that the point is not on the line). Because there are only finitely many there is a minimum non-zero distance. Also I can describe a line by 2 points on that line (although this description is not unique it doesn't have to be). Take point b and line (p,q) such that the point line distance is the minimum. Take r to be the 3rd point on line (p,q). Take c to be the perpendicular projection of point b onto (p,q). Also we can assume the order of the points is p then q then r on line (p,q) (this would be a lot easier with a diagram). Well now either q=c, or q is to the right of c or q is to the left of c.

I will show one case since the rest is the same.
Assume q and r on the same side of c (say right of c). Now call the perp projection of q onto (b,r) d. Now you have two similar triangles (b,c,r) and (q,d,r). But qr is shorter than rc which is shorter than br (since br is the hypotenuse) so qd is shorter than bc. But that means q is closer to line (b,r) than b is to (q,r). But that's a contradiction since we chose distance between b and (q,r) to be of minimum distance.

Again arildno I would love to see the inductive method of solving this.
Thanks, Steven
 
Brilliant proof, snoble. Here's a diagram to go with it :smile:
 

Attachments

  • sylv.JPG
    sylv.JPG
    5.1 KB · Views: 510
colinear points

Thank you all of you for your help

Didi
 
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top