Prove f(x) = sin(x^2) isn't periodic

  • Thread starter Thread starter Korisnik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Periodic
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the function f(x) = sin(x^2) is not periodic. Participants explore various methods and reasoning related to periodicity in trigonometric functions, particularly focusing on the implications of periodicity conditions.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the definition of periodicity and attempt to derive conditions under which f(x) could be periodic. They explore specific values of x to impose constraints on the period T and question the validity of assumptions made in the proofs.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing suggestions for alternative approaches and questioning the logic of previous arguments. Some participants express uncertainty about the correctness of their proofs, while others offer clarifications and corrections to earlier reasoning.

Contextual Notes

Several participants note the importance of ensuring that any proposed period T is independent of x, and they discuss the implications of squaring terms in the context of periodicity. There are also references to potential errors in reasoning related to the parity of integers involved in the proofs.

Korisnik
Messages
62
Reaction score
1
Member warned about posting homework questions w/o the template
Prove f(x) = sin(x^2) isn't periodic.

f is periodic if f(x + t) = f(x) for all x in f's domain.

I know about 1 way of proving it by derivative and boundedness but is this another way?

If f is periodic then
sin(x^2) = sin((x + t)^2)
Finding t:
(I don't know the proper way of doing this, maybe I ought to add + 2kpi)
x^2=x^2 +2xt + t^2
(I could square root it but it's the same)
t(t + 2x) = 0
t1 = 0 or t2 = -2x

t > 0 so t1 isn't.
t(x) = -2x, but t can't be dependent on x, as it needs to be constant, so t2 isn't a solutio . So I have proved the hipothesis.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you said, your function is periodic iff there is ##T>0## such that ##f(x+T) = f(x)## for all real ##x##.
Assume ##f## is periodic. If you set ##x = 0##, what constraint does it impose on ##T## ? Now if ##x = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} ##, does your function conserve its periodicity with the T you just found ?
 
Hi Korisnik:

Unfortunately your proof is flawed.
sin(x^2) = sin((x + t)^2) does not imply that x^2 = (x + t)^2.

I have not found a proof, but I have two suggestions that you might try. However, I am not sure either will be helpful.

1. Use the formula for sin(a+b).

2. Use the formula expressing sin(a) in terms of eia and e-ia.

ADDED
My apologies. I haven't done proofs for many decades. Geoffrey has the suggested the right approach.

Regards,
Buzz
 
geoffrey159 said:
As you said, your function is periodic iff there is ##T>0## such that ##f(x+T) = f(x)## for all real ##x##.
Assume ##f## is periodic. If you set ##x = 0##, what constraint does it impose on ##T## ? Now if ##x = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} ##, does your function conserve its periodicity with the T you just found ?
Alright, so ##T = \sqrt{k\pi}, k\in\mathbb{Z}##, as ##T>0##. Now ##x = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}## so ##f\left(\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}\right) = 1## and ##f\left(\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} + \sqrt{k\pi}\right) = \sin\left(\frac{\pi}{2} + k\pi +2\pi\sqrt{\frac{k}{2}}\right)## which will equal ##1## iff ##\frac{\pi}{2} + k\pi +2\pi\sqrt{\frac{k}{2}} = \frac{\pi}{2}+2k\pi ##. The solutions are ##0## and ##2##. If ##k = 0## ## T = 0##. For ##k = 2## ##T = \sqrt{2\pi}##. Now ##f\left(\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}\right) = 1 = f\left(\sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}} + \sqrt{2\pi}\right)## So the function is periodic?

I checked for ##x = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{4}}## and it didn't work, so I guess it isn't periodic then. Is this now an okay proof or still no?
 
Hi Korisnik:

Yes, you have a proof now. But you may want to restructure it a little for clarity.

Step 1 assumes x=0. From this you find all the possible values of T that could possible be the period: T=√kπ, k any integer but 0.
Step 2 assumes x = √π/2. This reduces the possible periods to +/- √2π.
Step 3 assumes x = √π/4. This shows that neither t = +√2π nor t=-√2π are a period.

Regards,
Buzz
 
If ## x = 0 ##, you want to solve ## \sin (T^2) = 0 ## and ## T > 0 ##. Therefore ##T^2 \in \{ k\pi,\ k\in\mathbb{N}-\{0\} \}##. So there is an integer ## k \ge 1 ## such that ##T = \sqrt{k\pi}##.

Now if ##x = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}## and ##f## is periodic, you must have ##1=f(x) = f(x+T) = (-1)^k \cos(\sqrt{2k}\pi ) ##. Now you see that ##\sqrt{2k}## is odd when ##k## is odd and even when ##k## is even.
What can you say depending on the parity of ##k## ?
 
Essentially, this boils down to the fact that squaring is not linear.
Assume a period exists. Call it T.
Then sin((kT)^2) = 0. Great. So T^2 is a period of the sine function.
For any x, sin((x+kT)^2) = sin(x^2).
But, sin((x+kT)^2) = sin(x^2 + 2kTx +(kT)^2 ). Since T^2 is a period of the sine function, you can say that this is also equal to sin(x^2 + 2kTx).
I am pretty sure it doesn't take too many steps to show that 2kTx can't be a period of sin(x) since it is a function of x.
 
Hi Korisnik:

I apologize again. At my age I have become too careless to do proofs, so I will stay out of this thread after this,

Since my quotes of equations get messed up, I have reproduced below an equation from your post #4:

π/2 + kπ +2π√(k/2) = π/2 + 2kπ​

The error you made (which I failed to catch before) is assuming that the k variable on the left hand side is the same as the k variable on the right hand side. These two k's need not be the same value. Therefore your conclusion that k must be 0 or 2 is wrong.

Regards,
Buzz
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Korisnik
Thanks for catching that.
geoffrey159 said:
Now if ##x = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2}}## and ##f## is periodic, you must have ##1=f(x) = f(x+T) = (-1)^k \cos(\sqrt{2k}\pi ) ##. Now you see that ##\sqrt{2k}## is odd when ##k## is odd and even when ##k## is even.
What can you say depending on the parity of ##k## ?
I'm not sure what you mean by that, as decimal numbers (possibly square root of 2k) don't have parity. The obvious is that the sign changes depending on k.
 
  • #10
Right, the sign changes and ##\sqrt{2k}## must be a positive integer of the same parity than ##k##.
Show it can't be odd. This will give you another constraint on the period, assuming it does exist.
Finally, try the case ##x=\sqrt{\pi}##, and you will get an absurd result which will prove that the hypothesis of periodicity is false.
 
  • #11
geoffrey159 said:
Right, the sign changes and ##\sqrt{2k}## must be a positive integer of the same parity than ##k##.
Show it can't be odd. This will give you another constraint on the period, assuming it does exist.
Finally, try the case ##x=\sqrt{\pi}##, and you will get an absurd result which will prove that the hypothesis of periodicity is false.
2k = 4t^2, t \in Z, so k is even.
2k = 4t^2 + 4t + 1, so now 2 times k is an odd number, which it can't be, as k is integer: 2k = 2(2t^2 + 2t) + 1 = 2m + 1 (t and m aren't specified, but are integers). And we know that odd squared gives odd, and even squared gives even, not odd, so k can't be odd.

I get this result (plugging in sqrt(k*pi) for T and sqrt(pi) for x):

1 + k + 2*sqrt(k) = m, m is > 0 integer. I'm not sure what you mean by absurd result. How does this yield a solution?
 
  • #12
Ok, so ## k = 2 t^2##. Then the period has an additional constraint : ##T = \sqrt{k\pi} = \sqrt{2\pi} t ##.
Now try ##T## with ##x = \sqrt{\pi}##, with the same kind of reasoning you should be able to conclude.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Korisnik
  • #13
geoffrey159 said:
Ok, so ## k = 2 t^2##. Then the period has an additional constraint : ##T = \sqrt{k\pi} = \sqrt{2\pi} t ##.
Now try ##T## with ##x = \sqrt{\pi}##, with the same kind of reasoning you should be able to conclude.
Right, I get sqrt(2)*2t + 2t^2 + 1 = m, m is integer. Can't be. Thanks. :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
10K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K