MHB Prove Geometry Inequality: 60° ≤ ($aA$+$bB$+$cC$)/($a$+$b$+$c$) < 90°

AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the inequality 60° ≤ (aA + bB + cC)/(a + b + c) < 90° for the angles A, B, C of a triangle and their opposite sides a, b, c. The expression represents a weighted mean of the triangle's angles, with each side's weight being less than half the perimeter, ensuring the upper limit is less than 90°. The proof highlights that the largest angle corresponds to the longest side, thus the weighted mean is at least equal to the unweighted mean of the angles, which is 60°. The arguments presented emphasize the geometric relationships within the triangle to establish the inequalities. The discussion concludes with a positive acknowledgment of the proof's clarity.
magneto1
Messages
100
Reaction score
0
(BMO, 2013) The angles $A$, $B$, $C$ of a triangle are measures in degrees, and the lengths of the opposite sides are
$a$,$b$,$c$ respectively. Prove:
\[
60^\circ \leq \frac{aA + bB + cC}{a + b + c} < 90^\circ.
\]

Edit: Update to include the degree symbol for clarification. Thanks, anemone.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
[sp]Let $p = a+b+c$ be the perimeter of the triangle. Then $\frac{aA + bB + cC}{a + b + c} = \frac apA + \frac bpB + \frac cpC$ is a weighted mean of the three angles. Each side of a triangle is always less than half the perimeter, so $\frac ap,\, \frac bp,\, \frac cp$ are all less than $\frac12.$ Thus $\frac apA + \frac bpB + \frac cpc < \frac12(A+B+C) = \frac12(180^\circ) = 90^\circ.$

For the other inequality, the largest angle of a triangle is always opposite the longest side, and the smallest angle is opposite the shortest side. (That is "geometrically obvious", but I don't offhand know a proof of it.) So the weighted mean $\frac apA + \frac bpB + \frac cpC$ gives the greatest weight to the largest angle and the least weight to the smallest angle, and therefore must be greater than (or equal to) the unweighted mean $\frac13 A + \frac13 B + \frac13 C = \frac13(180^\circ) = 60^\circ.$[/sp]
 
Opalg said:
[sp]Let $p = a+b+c$ be the perimeter of the triangle. Then $\frac{aA + bB + cC}{a + b + c} = \frac apA + \frac bpB + \frac cpC$ is a weighted mean of the three angles. Each side of a triangle is always less than half the perimeter, so $\frac ap,\, \frac bp,\, \frac cp$ are all less than $\frac12.$ Thus $\frac apA + \frac bpB + \frac cpc < \frac12(A+B+C) = \frac12(180^\circ) = 90^\circ.$

For the other inequality, the largest angle of a triangle is always opposite the longest side, and the smallest angle is opposite the shortest side. (That is "geometrically obvious", but I don't offhand know a proof of it.) So the weighted mean $\frac apA + \frac bpB + \frac cpC$ gives the greatest weight to the largest angle and the least weight to the smallest angle, and therefore must be greater than (or equal to) the unweighted mean $\frac13 A + \frac13 B + \frac13 C = \frac13(180^\circ) = 60^\circ.$[/sp]

Nicely done, Opalg. I would like to add a quick comment.

The ratio in the middle of the inequality remains identical for any triangle similar to $\triangle ABC$ as each side $a$, $b$, $c$ will just be replaced by $ka$, $kb$, $kc$ off some factor $k$. So without loss, we can just assume $a+b+c=1$. That makes the problem easier.

If you assume that, $< 90^\circ$ comes from the triangle inequality (to justify each side is less than $\frac 12$), and $60^\circ \leq$ comes from $180 = (A+B+C)(a+b+c)$ and the rearrangement inequality.
 
Seemingly by some mathematical coincidence, a hexagon of sides 2,2,7,7, 11, and 11 can be inscribed in a circle of radius 7. The other day I saw a math problem on line, which they said came from a Polish Olympiad, where you compute the length x of the 3rd side which is the same as the radius, so that the sides of length 2,x, and 11 are inscribed on the arc of a semi-circle. The law of cosines applied twice gives the answer for x of exactly 7, but the arithmetic is so complex that the...
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top