Prove: I+J is Smallest Interval Containing x+y

  • Thread starter Thread starter cmajor47
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Interval
cmajor47
Messages
53
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove that I+J is the smallest interval containing all x+y, for x \in I and y \in J.

Homework Equations


I+J=[r+u,s+v]

The Attempt at a Solution


Let I=[r,s] and J=[u,v]
Then I+J=[r+u,s+v] for all x \in I and y \in J
x \in I means r \leq x \leq s
y \in J means u \leq y\leq v
Then r+u \leq x+y \leq s+v
So x+y \in I+J

Is this proof sufficient? I feel like I should say something at the end but don't quite know what to say? Did I miss anything in the proof?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I don't believe that you have shown this to be the smallest interval. The operation of addition of intervals is new to me, so I'm uncertain whether how you have defined I + J applies to all cases. E.g., does this apply to intervals that are separated, or that overlap, or where one interval is contained within another?

To prove that the interval you show is the smallest, one approach is to assume that I + J is not the smallest interval and work towards a contradiction.
 
Is this a better proof?

Let I=[r,s] and J=[u,v]
Then I+J=[r+u,s+v] for all x \in I and y \in J
x \in I means r \leq x \leq s
So the most x can be is s and the least x can be is r
y \in J means u \leq y\leq v
So the most y can be is u and the least y can be is v
Then r+u \leq x+y \leq s+v
So the most x+y can be is s+v and the least x+y can be is r+u
So x+y \in I+J and [r+u,s+v] is the smallest interval that contains all x+y for x \in I and y \in J
 
Looks OK to me. Maybe someone else will weigh in if not.
 
There are two things I don't understand about this problem. First, when finding the nth root of a number, there should in theory be n solutions. However, the formula produces n+1 roots. Here is how. The first root is simply ##\left(r\right)^{\left(\frac{1}{n}\right)}##. Then you multiply this first root by n additional expressions given by the formula, as you go through k=0,1,...n-1. So you end up with n+1 roots, which cannot be correct. Let me illustrate what I mean. For this...
Back
Top