MHB Prove Identity: (1+sin(x))/(1-sin(x))=2tan^2(x)+1+2tan(x)sec(x)

  • Thread starter Thread starter Sean1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
Sean1
Messages
5
Reaction score
0
I cannot seem to prove the following identity

(1+sin(x))/(1-sin(x))=2tan^2(x)+1+2tan(x)sec(x)

Can you assist?
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Hi Sean,

Let's start with the left-hand side.

$$\frac{1+\sin(x)}{1-\sin(x)}$$.

We want this to turn into an expression without a fraction, so maybe we can try getting rid of the denominator somehow. When I see something in the form of $a-b$, I often try multiplying by the conjugate $a+b$.

$$\frac{1+\sin(x)}{1-\sin(x)} \left( \frac{1+\sin(x)}{1+\sin(x)} \right) $$

What do you get after trying this?
 
Thanks for getting me started.

This is my working. Can you confirm my approach is correct?

View attachment 4467
 

Attachments

  • identity solution.PNG
    identity solution.PNG
    2.9 KB · Views: 138
Last edited:
Looks good! :)
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
Thread 'Imaginary Pythagorus'
I posted this in the Lame Math thread, but it's got me thinking. Is there any validity to this? Or is it really just a mathematical trick? Naively, I see that i2 + plus 12 does equal zero2. But does this have a meaning? I know one can treat the imaginary number line as just another axis like the reals, but does that mean this does represent a triangle in the complex plane with a hypotenuse of length zero? Ibix offered a rendering of the diagram using what I assume is matrix* notation...
Back
Top