MHB Prove Identity: $b_1x^3=b_2y^3=b_3z^3$ & $\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z}=1$

  • Thread starter Thread starter Albert1
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Identity
AI Thread Summary
The discussion centers on proving the identity involving the equations $b_1x^3 = b_2y^3 = b_3z^3$ and $\frac{1}{x} + \frac{1}{y} + \frac{1}{z} = 1$. Participants are tasked with demonstrating that $\sqrt[3]{b_1x^2 + b_2y^2 + b_3z^2} = \sqrt[3]{b_1} + \sqrt[3]{b_2} + \sqrt[3]{b_3}$. The conversation includes attempts to manipulate the given equations to arrive at the desired result. The proof requires a solid understanding of algebraic manipulation and properties of cube roots. Overall, the focus is on establishing the validity of the proposed identity through mathematical reasoning.
Albert1
Messages
1,221
Reaction score
0
(1):
$b_1x^3=b_2y^3=b_3z^3$
(2):
$\dfrac{1}{x}+\dfrac{1}{y}+\dfrac{1}{z}=1$
prove:
$\sqrt[3]{b_1x^2+b_2y^2+b_3z^2}=\sqrt[3] {b_1}+\sqrt[3] {b_2} + \sqrt[3] {b_3}$
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Re: prove the indentity

Albert said:
(1):
$b_1x^3=b_2y^3=b_3z^3$
(2):
$\dfrac{1}{x}+\dfrac{1}{y}+\dfrac{1}{z}=1$
prove:
$\sqrt[3]{b_1x^2+b_2y^2+b_3z^2}=\sqrt[3] {b_1}+\sqrt[3] {b_2} + \sqrt[3] {b_3}$

Hello.

\sqrt[3]{b_1x^2+b_2y^2+b_3z^2}=

=\sqrt[3]{\frac{b_1x^3}{x}+\frac{b_2y^3}{y}+\frac{b_3z^3}{z}}=

=\sqrt[3]{\frac{b_2y^3}{x}+\frac{b_2y^3}{y}+\frac{b_2y^3}{z}}=

=y \sqrt[3]{b_2} \sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{x}+\frac{1}{y}+\frac{1}{z}}= y \sqrt[3]{b_2} (*)

\dfrac{1}{x}+\dfrac{1}{y}+\dfrac{1}{z}= \dfrac{\sqrt[3]{b_1}}{y \sqrt[3]{b_2}}+\dfrac{\sqrt[3]{b_2}}{y \sqrt[3]{b_2}}+\dfrac{\sqrt[3]{b_3}}{y \sqrt[3]{b_2}}=1 \rightarrow{}

\rightarrow{} \sqrt[3]{b_1}+\sqrt[3]{b_2}+\sqrt[3]{b_3}=y \sqrt[3]{b_2} (**)

For (*) and (**):

\sqrt[3]{b_1x^2+b_2y^2+b_3z^2}=\sqrt[3] {b_1}+\sqrt[3] {b_2} + \sqrt[3] {b_3}

Regards.
 
Thread 'Video on imaginary numbers and some queries'
Hi, I was watching the following video. I found some points confusing. Could you please help me to understand the gaps? Thanks, in advance! Question 1: Around 4:22, the video says the following. So for those mathematicians, negative numbers didn't exist. You could subtract, that is find the difference between two positive quantities, but you couldn't have a negative answer or negative coefficients. Mathematicians were so averse to negative numbers that there was no single quadratic...
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Thread 'Unit Circle Double Angle Derivations'
Here I made a terrible mistake of assuming this to be an equilateral triangle and set 2sinx=1 => x=pi/6. Although this did derive the double angle formulas it also led into a terrible mess trying to find all the combinations of sides. I must have been tired and just assumed 6x=180 and 2sinx=1. By that time, I was so mindset that I nearly scolded a person for even saying 90-x. I wonder if this is a case of biased observation that seeks to dis credit me like Jesus of Nazareth since in reality...
Back
Top